StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Animate.css vs Tailwind CSS

Animate.css vs Tailwind CSS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245
Animate.css
Animate.css
Stacks11.4K
Followers3.1K
Votes0

Animate.css vs Tailwind CSS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Animate.css and Tailwind CSS are both popular CSS frameworks used for building websites and web applications. However, they have key differences that set them apart in terms of their approach and functionality.

  1. Ease of Use and Customization: Animate.css provides a straightforward way to add pre-defined animations to elements, making it easy to use without requiring much customization. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS offers a highly customizable utility-first approach, allowing developers to create their own animations and styles using its extensive utility classes.

  2. Animation Options: Animate.css offers a wide range of pre-built animation options, including fade, slide, rotate, zoom, and more. These animations can be applied to various CSS properties such as opacity, position, transform, and more. In contrast, Tailwind CSS does not provide any built-in animation options, but it offers utility classes for transitions, such as fading and scaling, which can be combined with custom CSS animations.

  3. File Size: Animate.css is a standalone CSS file that includes all the pre-defined animation styles, resulting in a larger file size. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS provides a utility-first approach and allows developers to include only the required utility classes, resulting in a smaller file size. This can be beneficial for performance and loading times, especially on mobile devices with limited bandwidth.

  4. Design System vs Animation Library: Tailwind CSS is primarily focused on providing a comprehensive design system with utility classes for managing styles, spacing, and layout, while Animate.css is specifically designed as an animation library, focusing solely on providing pre-built animations. This fundamental difference in purpose makes Tailwind CSS more versatile for building entire websites, whereas Animate.css is more suitable when animations are the main focus.

  5. Documentation and Community Support: Animate.css has been around longer and has a larger community and extensive documentation, making it easier for beginners to learn and use. Tailwind CSS also has a growing community and good documentation, but as a newer framework, it may have a slightly smaller support base.

  6. Integration and Compatibility: Animate.css can be easily integrated into any website or web application by adding the CSS file and applying the animation classes. It can be used with any CSS framework or library. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS is a complete CSS framework that needs to be installed and configured, and it may require more effort to integrate into an existing project using a different CSS framework or library.

In Summary, Animate.css provides pre-defined animations with ease of use, while Tailwind CSS offers extensive customization and a comprehensive design system for building websites.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Tailwind CSS, Animate.css

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments
Sai Karun
Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Animate.css
Animate.css

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
Statistics
Stacks
4.8K
Stacks
11.4K
Followers
3.1K
Followers
3.1K
Votes
245
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Tailwind CSS, Animate.css ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase