StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Apache Ignite vs MapDB

Apache Ignite vs MapDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite
Stacks110
Followers168
Votes41
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.9K
MapDB
MapDB
Stacks8
Followers49
Votes0

Apache Ignite vs MapDB: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Apache Ignite and MapDB are both in-memory data management systems but have key differences that differentiate their use cases and functionalities.

  1. Data Storage Mechanism: Apache Ignite stores data in-memory and on-disk, allowing for faster data processing and larger dataset storage capability. In contrast, MapDB primarily focuses on in-memory storage and utilizes disk storage as a backup option, making it more suitable for smaller datasets and lower memory consumption.

  2. Data Distribution and Replication: Apache Ignite offers robust data distribution and replication capabilities, allowing for data to be distributed across multiple nodes in a cluster for high availability and fault tolerance. MapDB, on the other hand, does not emphasize data distribution and replication as extensively, making it more suitable for single-node or standalone use cases.

  3. Transaction Support: Apache Ignite provides ACID transactions support, ensuring data consistency and reliability in transactional scenarios. MapDB, although supporting transactions, may not have the same level of transactional capabilities and performance as Apache Ignite, making it more suitable for non-critical use cases.

  4. Query Processing: Apache Ignite has built-in support for SQL queries and indexing, making it suitable for complex query processing and analytics workloads. MapDB, while supporting basic querying functionalities, may not offer the same level of query optimization and indexing features, making it more suitable for simpler data retrieval tasks.

  5. Data Caching: Apache Ignite is widely used for data caching purposes, providing high-speed data access by leveraging in-memory storage. In contrast, MapDB may not be as optimized for caching purposes and may be more suitable for permanent storage and smaller datasets where caching is not the primary concern.

  6. Integration Ecosystem: Apache Ignite has a broader integration ecosystem with various third-party tools and frameworks, making it easier to integrate with existing systems and technologies. MapDB, although extensible, may have a more limited integration ecosystem, potentially requiring more custom development for seamless integration with other tools and platforms.

In Summary, Apache Ignite and MapDB differ in their data storage mechanism, data distribution capabilities, transaction support, query processing functionalities, data caching optimization, and integration ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite
MapDB
MapDB

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

MapDB provides Java Maps, Sets, Lists, Queues and other collections backed by off-heap or on-disk storage. It is a hybrid between java collection framework and embedded database engine. It is free and open-source under Apache license.

Memory-Centric Storage; Distributed SQL; Distributed Key-Value
Concurrency; Writing database; Code duplication and not invented here; Does not integrate with default tools and defacto standards; Did not follow test driven development; Not enough performance testing. ...
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
110
Stacks
8
Followers
168
Followers
49
Votes
41
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Multiple client language support
  • 5
    Written in java. runs on jvm
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    High Avaliability
  • 4
    Load balancing
No community feedback yet
Integrations
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Presto
Presto
Clever Cloud
Clever Cloud
SignalFx
SignalFx
Datadog
Datadog
OpsDash
OpsDash
Actionhero
Actionhero

What are some alternatives to Apache Ignite, MapDB?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

dbForge Studio for MySQL

dbForge Studio for MySQL

It is the universal MySQL and MariaDB client for database management, administration and development. With the help of this intelligent MySQL client the work with data and code has become easier and more convenient. This tool provides utilities to compare, synchronize, and backup MySQL databases with scheduling, and gives possibility to analyze and report MySQL tables data.

dbForge Studio for Oracle

dbForge Studio for Oracle

It is a powerful integrated development environment (IDE) which helps Oracle SQL developers to increase PL/SQL coding speed, provides versatile data editing tools for managing in-database and external data.

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

It is a GUI tool for database development and management. The IDE for PostgreSQL allows users to create, develop, and execute queries, edit and adjust the code to their requirements in a convenient and user-friendly interface.

dbForge Studio for SQL Server

dbForge Studio for SQL Server

It is a powerful IDE for SQL Server management, administration, development, data reporting and analysis. The tool will help SQL developers to manage databases, version-control database changes in popular source control systems, speed up routine tasks, as well, as to make complex database changes.

Liquibase

Liquibase

Liquibase is th leading open-source tool for database schema change management. Liquibase helps teams track, version, and deploy database schema and logic changes so they can automate their database code process with their app code process.

Sequel Pro

Sequel Pro

Sequel Pro is a fast, easy-to-use Mac database management application for working with MySQL databases.

DBeaver

DBeaver

It is a free multi-platform database tool for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators and analysts. Supports all popular databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Oracle, DB2, SQL Server, Sybase, Teradata, MongoDB, Cassandra, Redis, etc.

dbForge SQL Complete

dbForge SQL Complete

It is an IntelliSense add-in for SQL Server Management Studio, designed to provide the fastest T-SQL query typing ever possible.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase