Total.js vs Aqueduct | What are the differences? | StackShare

Aqueduct vs Total.js

Overview

Total.js

Stacks20

Followers62

Votes37

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks446

Aqueduct

Stacks17

Followers48

Votes9

GitHub Stars2.4K

Forks275

Aqueduct vs Total.js: What are the differences?

What is Aqueduct? Dart on the server. Aqueduct is an open source, server-side web framework written in Google’s Dart language. Aqueduct promises faster development, experimentation and testing – without sacrificing power.

What is Total.js? Framework for creating rich web sites, web applications, e-commerce and real-time applications. It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC.

Aqueduct and Total.js can be primarily classified as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Aqueduct and Total.js are both open source tools. Total.js with 3.97K GitHub stars and 434 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Aqueduct with 1.2K GitHub stars and 81 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Microframeworks on StackShare

Hamilton Microframeworks

A scalable general purpose micro-framework for defining dataflows

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

Total.js	Aqueduct
It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC	Aqueduct is an open source, server-side web framework written in Google’s Dart language. Aqueduct promises faster development, experimentation and testing – without sacrificing power.
Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling	Adheres to semantic versioning
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.4K	GitHub Stars 2.4K
GitHub Forks 446	GitHub Forks 275
Stacks 20	Stacks 17
Followers 62	Followers 48
Votes 37	Votes 9
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Rapid development 5 Fast 4 Low-code tools 4 Great support 3 Npm Cons 3 Lack of source code documentation 2 Developed as "one man show" 2 Poor community 2 Poor design - 4000 line files 2 Messes up global namespace and default prototypes	Pros 4 Fast 3 Aqueduct is the future 2 Dart on the server
Integrations
npm Node.js PostGraphile Sentry	OAuth2 Dart PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Total.js, Aqueduct?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.