StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Video Hosting
  4. Video Streaming
  5. ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform vs Wowza

ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform vs Wowza

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Wowza
Wowza
Stacks43
Followers72
Votes0
ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform
ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform
Stacks1
Followers1
Votes0

ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform vs Wowza: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Cost-Efficiency**: ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform offers a more cost-effective solution compared to Wowza, making it a budget-friendly option for businesses looking to stream videos without breaking the bank. 
   
2. **Scalability**: ArvanCloud offers a highly scalable infrastructure that can easily handle sudden spikes in traffic without compromising the quality of the streaming experience for viewers. On the other hand, Wowza may struggle to scale efficiently under heavy loads.
   
3. **Global Reach**: ArvanCloud has a vast global network of servers, allowing for faster content delivery to viewers worldwide. This international presence gives ArvanCloud an edge over Wowza in terms of reaching a diverse audience.
   
4. **Ease of Use**: ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform provides a user-friendly interface and easy setup process, making it accessible even for users with limited technical knowledge. In contrast, Wowza may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.
   
5. **Security Features**: ArvanCloud offers robust security features, including DDoS protection and encryption, ensuring that your video content remains safe and secure. This level of security may not be as comprehensive in Wowza's platform, potentially leaving content vulnerable to cyber threats.
   
6. **Customer Support**: ArvanCloud provides excellent customer support, with 24/7 assistance available to help users troubleshoot any issues that may arise. In comparison, Wowza's customer support may be limited in availability or responsiveness, impacting the user experience.

In Summary, ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform offers cost-efficiency, scalability, global reach, ease of use, security features, and superior customer support compared to Wowza.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Wowza, ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform

Kerry
Kerry

Apr 23, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon S3Amazon S3DockerDockerWowzaWowza

We would like to connect a number of (about 25) video streams, from an Amazon S3 bucket containing video data to endpoints accessible to a Docker image, which, when run, will process the input video streams and emit some JSON statistics.

The 25 video streams should be synchronized. Could people share their experiences with a similar scenario and perhaps offer advice about which is better (Wowza, Amazon Kinesis Video Streams) for this kind of problem, or why they chose one technology over the other?

The video stream duration will be quite long (about 8 hours each x 25 camera sources). The 25 video streams will have no audio component. If you worked with a similar problem, what was your experience with scaling, latency, resource requirements, config, etc.?

88.9k views88.9k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Jul 29, 2020

Needs adviceonBitmovinBitmovinWowzaWowza

We want to make a live streaming platform demo to show off our video compression technology.

Simply put, we will stream content from 12 x 4K cameras ——> to an edge server(s) containing our compression software ——> either to Bitmovin or Wowza ——> to a media player.

What we would like to know is, is one of the above streaming engines more suited to multiple feeds (we will eventually be using more than 100 4K cameras for the actual streaming platform), 4K content streaming, latency, and functions such as being to Zoom in on the 4K content?

If anyone has any insight into the above, we would be grateful for your advice. We are a Japanese company and were recommended the above two streaming engines but know nothing about them as they literally “foreign” to us.

Thanks so much.

86.6k views86.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Wowza
Wowza
ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform
ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform

It offers a customizable live streaming platform to build, deploy and manage high-quality video, live and on-demand. It powers professional-grade streaming for any use case and any device.

It allows content providers and distributors to convert their video content to different formats and qualities. You can store your videos in unlimited cloud storage and serve them with adaptive bitrate feature for your users.

Cloud Streaming Services; Streaming Server Software
Compatible with All Devices and Browsers; Adaptive Bitrate Streaming; Free Web Player; Smart and Automatic Converting;Adding Watermarks
Statistics
Stacks
43
Stacks
1
Followers
72
Followers
1
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
PHP
PHP
WordPress
WordPress
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Wowza, ArvanCloud Video Streaming Platform?

OBS Studio

OBS Studio

It is a free and open source software for video recording and live streaming. It is equipped with a powerful API, enabling plugins and scripts to provide further customization and functionality specific to your needs. It supports all your favorite streaming platforms and more.

Mux Video

Mux Video

It is an API-first platform, powered by data and designed by video experts to make the beautiful video possible for every development team.

Amazon Kinesis Video Streams

Amazon Kinesis Video Streams

Amazon Kinesis Video Streams makes it easy to securely stream video from connected devices to AWS for analytics, machine learning (ML), and other processing. Kinesis Video Streams automatically provisions and elastically scales all the infrastructure needed to ingest streaming video data from millions of devices. It also durably stores, encrypts, and indexes video data in your streams, and allows you to access your data through easy-to-use APIs.

api.video

api.video

api.video is an API-first platform which enables developers to build, scale and operate on-demand and live video streaming in their own apps and platforms in minutes, with just a few lines of code.

Bitmovin

Bitmovin

It provides adaptive streaming infrastructure for video publishers and integrators. Fastest cloud encoding and HTML5 Player, play Video Anywhere.

Lightspeed

Lightspeed

It is a self contained OBS -> FTL -> WebRTC live streaming server. It is comprised of 3 parts once configured anyone can achieve sub-second OBS to the browser livestreaming.

Ant Media Server

Ant Media Server

It is streaming engine software that provides adaptive, ultra low latency streaming by using WebRTC technology with ~0.5 seconds latency. It is both horizontally and vertically scalable. It can run on-premise or on-cloud.

OneStream Live

OneStream Live

Schedule & Live Stream Recorded Videos to 40+ Social Media Platforms Simultaneously. Multicast to 40+ streaming networks including Facebook Live, YouTube, Twitter's Periscope, Twitch, Mixer, Smashcast & many more.

muse.ai

muse.ai

Cheapest way to host and share your video without adverts. Includes the most advanced AI powered in-video search.

Owncast

Owncast

It is a self-hosted live video and web chat server for use with existing popular broadcasting software. Point your live stream at a server you personally control and regain ownership over your content.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase