Asciidoctor vs XML

Overview

XML

Stacks516

Followers315

Votes2

Asciidoctor

Stacks154

Followers66

Votes2

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Asciidoctor vs XML: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Asciidoctor and XML are two different markup languages commonly used in technical writing. Understanding the key differences between Asciidoctor and XML can help users decide which language is best suited for their specific needs.

1. **Syntax**: Asciidoctor is a human-readable, lightweight markup language that uses plain text formatting to structure documents, making it easier for writers to focus on content creation. XML, on the other hand, is a more complex markup language that uses tags to define data with a hierarchical structure, which can be more challenging for beginners to work with.

2. **Extensions**: Asciidoctor allows for the creation of custom extensions, enabling users to add additional functionality to their documents easily. XML, however, does not have built-in support for extensions, making it less flexible in terms of customization compared to Asciidoctor.

3. **Output**: Asciidoctor can generate various output formats such as HTML, PDF, and EPUB, making it a versatile choice for creating different types of documents. XML, on the other hand, is primarily used for storing and transporting data, with limited options for direct output formatting.

4. **Learning Curve**: Asciidoctor has a shorter learning curve compared to XML, as its syntax is more intuitive and easier to grasp for beginners. XML's extensive set of rules and syntax can be overwhelming for newcomers, requiring more time and effort to become proficient in its usage.

5. **Community Support**: Asciidoctor has a vibrant and active community of users and developers who contribute to the language's development and provide assistance to newcomers. XML also has a supportive community but may not offer as many resources specifically tailored to beginners in comparison to Asciidoctor.

6. **Integration**: Asciidoctor can easily integrate with other tools and platforms such as GitHub, making collaboration and version control more straightforward for teams working on documents. XML, while widely used and supported, may require additional tools or plugins to achieve seamless integration with popular platforms.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Asciidoctor and XML can help users choose the best markup language for their specific document needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

XML	Asciidoctor
A markup language that defines a set of rules for encoding documents in a format that is both human-readable and machine-readable.	It is a fast, open source text processor and publishing toolchain for converting AsciiDoc content to HTML5, DocBook, PDF, and other formats. Asciidoctor is written in Ruby and runs on all major operating systems
-	Lightweight markup language for authoring notes; Articles; Documentation; Books, web pages, slide decks and man pages in plain text.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 516	Stacks 154
Followers 315	Followers 66
Votes 2	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Fun	Pros 1 Versatile 1 GitHub integration 0 Easy fornatting
Integrations
No integrations available	Java JavaScript GitHub Ruby Gradle HTML5 Apache Maven JRuby

What are some alternatives to XML, Asciidoctor?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Asciidoctor vs XML: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Asciidoctor and XML are two different markup languages commonly used in technical writing. Understanding the key differences between Asciidoctor and XML can help users decide which language is best suited for their specific needs.

1. **Syntax**: Asciidoctor is a human-readable, lightweight markup language that uses plain text formatting to structure documents, making it easier for writers to focus on content creation. XML, on the other hand, is a more complex markup language that uses tags to define data with a hierarchical structure, which can be more challenging for beginners to work with.

2. **Extensions**: Asciidoctor allows for the creation of custom extensions, enabling users to add additional functionality to their documents easily. XML, however, does not have built-in support for extensions, making it less flexible in terms of customization compared to Asciidoctor.

3. **Output**: Asciidoctor can generate various output formats such as HTML, PDF, and EPUB, making it a versatile choice for creating different types of documents. XML, on the other hand, is primarily used for storing and transporting data, with limited options for direct output formatting.

4. **Learning Curve**: Asciidoctor has a shorter learning curve compared to XML, as its syntax is more intuitive and easier to grasp for beginners. XML's extensive set of rules and syntax can be overwhelming for newcomers, requiring more time and effort to become proficient in its usage.

5. **Community Support**: Asciidoctor has a vibrant and active community of users and developers who contribute to the language's development and provide assistance to newcomers. XML also has a supportive community but may not offer as many resources specifically tailored to beginners in comparison to Asciidoctor.

6. **Integration**: Asciidoctor can easily integrate with other tools and platforms such as GitHub, making collaboration and version control more straightforward for teams working on documents. XML, while widely used and supported, may require additional tools or plugins to achieve seamless integration with popular platforms.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Asciidoctor and XML can help users choose the best markup language for their specific document needs.

Asciidoctor vs XML

Overview