Atmosphere vs Next.js: What are the differences?

# Introduction
## Key Differences between Atmosphere and Next.js

1. **Rendering Approach**: Atmosphere uses server-side rendering, where the page is rendered on the server and sent to the client as a fully-formed HTML document, resulting in faster initial page loads. On the other hand, Next.js supports both server-side rendering and client-side rendering, allowing developers to choose the optimal rendering approach for their application.
2. **File Structure**: Atmosphere follows a file-based routing system, where each page corresponds to a file within the project structure. In contrast, Next.js utilizes the pages directory for routing, making it easier for developers to organize and manage their application's components and routes.
3. **Data Fetching**: Atmosphere provides limited support for data fetching, requiring developers to implement their own solutions for fetching data from external sources. Whereas, Next.js offers built-in data fetching methods such as getStaticProps and getServerSideProps, streamlining the process of fetching and supplying data to the application.
4. **Routing Configuration**: In Atmosphere, developers manually configure routing using server-side code, which can be more complex and error-prone. Next.js simplifies routing configuration by automatically handling client-side routing, reducing the overhead of routing implementation and maintenance.
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Next.js has a larger and more active community compared to Atmosphere, leading to a wider range of resources, plugins, and support available for developers. This vibrant ecosystem of Next.js enhances productivity and fosters innovation in web development projects.

In Summary, the key differences between Atmosphere and Next.js lie in their rendering approach, file structure, data fetching capabilities, routing configuration, and community support.