Aura vs Mono

Overview

Aura

Stacks53

Followers56

Votes1

GitHub Stars2.9K

Forks255

Mono

Stacks94

Followers59

Votes1

GitHub Stars11.4K

Forks3.8K

Aura vs Mono: What are the differences?

What is Aura? Modern tools for modern applications. The Aura project centers around a collection of high-quality, well-tested, semantically versioned, standards-compliant, independent library packages that can be used in any codebase.

What is Mono? *Open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework *. It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.

Aura and Mono can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Aura and Mono are both open source tools. It seems that Mono with 8.19K GitHub stars and 3.28K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Aura with 2.98K GitHub stars and 269 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Aura has a broader approval, being mentioned in 9 company stacks & 19 developers stacks; compared to Mono, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Detailed Comparison

Aura	Mono
The Aura project centers around a collection of high-quality, well-tested, semantically versioned, standards-compliant, independent library packages that can be used in any codebase.	It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.
-	Cross platform ;Open source; Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.9K	GitHub Stars 11.4K
GitHub Forks 255	GitHub Forks 3.8K
Stacks 53	Stacks 94
Followers 56	Followers 59
Votes 1	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Open source	Pros 1 It was great, pre-dotnetcore
Integrations
PHP	Entity Framework Mac OS X C# Windows Debian

What are some alternatives to Aura, Mono?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.