StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs T3

Awesomplete vs T3

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

T3
T3
Stacks28
Followers39
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks145
Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607

Awesomplete vs T3: What are the differences?

Introduction: Awesomplete and T3 are two popular autocomplete libraries used in web development to enhance user experience and improve search functionality on websites.

  1. Compatibility with Libraries: Awesomplete is a standalone library that does not require any external dependencies, making it lightweight and easy to implement. On the other hand, T3 is built on top of jQuery, which means it requires jQuery to function properly.

  2. Customization Options: Awesomplete offers more customization options out of the box, allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of the autocomplete dropdown, input field, and suggestions. T3, on the other hand, provides fewer customization options by default, requiring more extensive customization through CSS and JavaScript.

  3. Data Source Flexibility: Awesomplete supports various data sources, including arrays, functions, and AJAX requests, making it versatile for different use cases. T3 primarily relies on arrays as its data source, limiting its flexibility when dealing with dynamic or large datasets.

  4. Browser Compatibility: Awesomplete is known for its wide browser compatibility, working seamlessly across different browsers and devices. T3 may encounter compatibility issues with older browsers due to its reliance on jQuery and potentially outdated JavaScript syntax.

  5. Performance: Awesomplete is optimized for performance, providing fast and efficient autocomplete functionality even with large datasets. T3's performance may vary depending on the size of the dataset and the complexity of the autocomplete implementation.

  6. Community Support and Updates: Awesomplete has a smaller but dedicated community that actively maintains and updates the library with new features and bug fixes. T3, being built on jQuery, benefits from the larger jQuery community but may have less frequent updates and support compared to standalone libraries.

In Summary, Awesomplete offers standalone lightweight functionality, extensive customization options, and data source flexibility, while T3 integrates with jQuery, provides limited customization options, and may encounter compatibility issues with older browsers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

T3
T3
Awesomplete
Awesomplete

T3 is different than most JavaScript frameworks. It's meant to be a small piece of an overall architecture that allows you to build scalable client-side code. T3 is explicitly not an MVC framework. It's a framework that allows the creation of loosely-coupled components while letting you decide what other pieces you need for your web application. You can use T3 with other frameworks like Backbone or React, or you can use T3 by itself.

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

-
Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Forks
145
GitHub Forks
607
Stacks
28
Stacks
61
Followers
39
Followers
8
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
Integrations
No integrations available
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to T3, Awesomplete?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase