StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs Yoga

Awesomplete vs Yoga

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607
Yoga
Yoga
Stacks77
Followers45
Votes5
GitHub Stars18.4K
Forks1.5K

Awesomplete vs Yoga: What are the differences?

  1. Functionality: Awesomplete is a lightweight auto-complete library that supports filtering, sorting, and pagination of results, making it ideal for search functionality. On the other hand, Yoga is a CSS flexbox grid system that focuses on providing a responsive layout for web applications.
  2. Customization Options: Awesomplete offers extensive customization options, allowing users to control the styling, behavior, and appearance of the auto-complete widget. In contrast, Yoga mainly focuses on providing predefined responsive grid classes without much flexibility for customization.
  3. Data Sources: Awesomplete can fetch data from various sources such as arrays, Ajax, or local variables, providing dynamic suggestions based on the user's input. Yoga, on the other hand, relies on predefined grid classes that can be easily integrated into the HTML markup for creating responsive layouts.
  4. Browser Compatibility: Awesomplete provides excellent browser compatibility, working seamlessly across various modern browsers without compatibility issues. Meanwhile, Yoga also ensures compatibility with different browsers, allowing developers to create consistent layouts across multiple platforms.
  5. Community Support: Awesomplete has a vibrant community that actively contributes to the library by providing updates, fixes, and extensions to enhance its functionality. In comparison, Yoga might have a smaller community due to its focused purpose on providing a flexible grid system for responsive layouts.
  6. Learning Curve: Awesomplete has a relatively straightforward learning curve, making it easy for developers to integrate and customize the auto-complete feature. On the other hand, Yoga may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its complex grid system and extensive class options for responsive design.

In Summary, Awesomplete is a versatile auto-complete library with extensive customization options and dynamic data sources, while Yoga is a responsive grid system focused on providing predefined grid classes for creating flexible layouts.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Yoga
Yoga

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

Yoga is a cross-platform layout engine which implements Flexbox. Yoga enables maximum collaboration within your team by implementing an API familiar to many designers and opening it up to developers across different platforms.

Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Stars
18.4K
GitHub Forks
607
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
61
Stacks
77
Followers
8
Followers
45
Votes
2
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
Pros
  • 5
    Jhgjhgjhgjgjhghjg
  • 0
    5wyrtbagbnargnargnargn
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Awesomplete, Yoga?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase