AWS DeepRacer vs Google AutoML Tables

Overview

Google AutoML Tables

Stacks23

Followers64

Votes0

AWS DeepRacer

Stacks3

Followers6

Votes0

AWS DeepRacer vs Google AutoML Tables: What are the differences?

Model Training Process: In AWS DeepRacer, model training is primarily done through reinforcement learning where the model learns based on rewards and penalties given for different actions. On the other hand, Google AutoML Tables utilizes supervised learning, where the model is trained on historical labeled data to make predictions.
Targeted Use Cases: AWS DeepRacer is specifically designed for autonomous racing applications, focusing on teaching autonomous vehicles how to navigate tracks efficiently. In contrast, Google AutoML Tables is a more general-purpose tool that can be applied to various use cases beyond autonomous driving, such as sales forecasting or fraud detection.
Ease of Use: AWS DeepRacer provides a more hands-on and interactive learning experience for users who are interested in reinforcement learning and self-driving cars. Google AutoML Tables, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the machine learning process, making it accessible even to users with limited technical knowledge.
Integration with Cloud Environment: AWS DeepRacer is integrated with the broader AWS ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with other Amazon Web Services for data storage, processing, and deployment. In comparison, Google AutoML Tables is part of the Google Cloud Platform, offering integration with Google's suite of cloud services and infrastructure.
Customization and Flexibility: With AWS DeepRacer, users can have more control and customization over the training processes, algorithms, and hyperparameters due to the nature of reinforcement learning. Google AutoML Tables, while easy to use, may have limitations in terms of advanced customization options for machine learning models.
Cost Structure: The pricing models for AWS DeepRacer and Google AutoML Tables differ significantly. AWS DeepRacer follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users are charged based on usage and training time. Google AutoML Tables, on the other hand, has a pricing structure based on the number of predictions made by the model, which can be more cost-effective for certain use cases.

In Summary, AWS DeepRacer and Google AutoML Tables differ in their model training processes, targeted use cases, ease of use, integration with cloud environments, customization options, and cost structures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google AutoML Tables	AWS DeepRacer
Enables your entire team of data scientists, analysts, and developers to automatically build and deploy machine learning models on structured data at massively increased speed and scale.	Developers of all skill levels can get hands on with machine learning through a cloud based 3D racing simulator, fully autonomous 1/18th scale race car driven by reinforcement learning, and global racing league.
Increases model quality; Easy to build models; Easy to deploy; Flexible user options; Doesn’t require a large annual licensing fee	A fun way to learn machine learning; Master the basics with time-trial racing; Expand your skills with head-to-head racing
Statistics
Stacks 23	Stacks 3
Followers 64	Followers 6
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Google App Engine Google Cloud Dataflow	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google AutoML Tables, AWS DeepRacer?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

AWS DeepRacer vs Google AutoML Tables: What are the differences?

Model Training Process: In AWS DeepRacer, model training is primarily done through reinforcement learning where the model learns based on rewards and penalties given for different actions. On the other hand, Google AutoML Tables utilizes supervised learning, where the model is trained on historical labeled data to make predictions.
Targeted Use Cases: AWS DeepRacer is specifically designed for autonomous racing applications, focusing on teaching autonomous vehicles how to navigate tracks efficiently. In contrast, Google AutoML Tables is a more general-purpose tool that can be applied to various use cases beyond autonomous driving, such as sales forecasting or fraud detection.
Ease of Use: AWS DeepRacer provides a more hands-on and interactive learning experience for users who are interested in reinforcement learning and self-driving cars. Google AutoML Tables, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the machine learning process, making it accessible even to users with limited technical knowledge.
Integration with Cloud Environment: AWS DeepRacer is integrated with the broader AWS ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with other Amazon Web Services for data storage, processing, and deployment. In comparison, Google AutoML Tables is part of the Google Cloud Platform, offering integration with Google's suite of cloud services and infrastructure.
Customization and Flexibility: With AWS DeepRacer, users can have more control and customization over the training processes, algorithms, and hyperparameters due to the nature of reinforcement learning. Google AutoML Tables, while easy to use, may have limitations in terms of advanced customization options for machine learning models.
Cost Structure: The pricing models for AWS DeepRacer and Google AutoML Tables differ significantly. AWS DeepRacer follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users are charged based on usage and training time. Google AutoML Tables, on the other hand, has a pricing structure based on the number of predictions made by the model, which can be more cost-effective for certain use cases.

AWS DeepRacer vs Google AutoML Tables

Overview