StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Lambda vs Zappa

AWS Lambda vs Zappa

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Stacks26.0K
Followers18.8K
Votes432
Zappa
Zappa
Stacks68
Followers99
Votes0

AWS Lambda vs Zappa: What are the differences?

Introduction In this article, we will explore the key differences between AWS Lambda and Zappa. These are both popular serverless computing platforms that offer different features and capabilities for deploying and running applications. Understanding these differences can help you determine which platform is the best fit for your specific use case.

  1. Pricing and Cost: A significant difference between AWS Lambda and Zappa is their pricing models. AWS Lambda follows a "pay as you go" model, where you are charged based on the number of executions and the duration of each execution. On the other hand, Zappa provides a flat pricing structure, where you pay a fixed monthly fee regardless of the number of executions or duration. This can make Zappa a more cost-effective option for applications with high usage or long-running tasks.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: AWS Lambda offers a seamless integration with other AWS services, allowing you to build complex serverless architectures. It supports event-driven programming and can be triggered by various AWS services such as S3, DynamoDB, and API Gateway. In contrast, Zappa is primarily focused on deploying Python applications to AWS Lambda and does not offer the same level of integration with other AWS services. It provides a simplified deployment process specifically tailored for Python applications.

  3. Configuration and Management: AWS Lambda provides a comprehensive set of configuration options, allowing you to fine-tune your functions based on specific requirements. It supports environment variables, VPC configurations, resource allocation, and concurrency controls. Zappa, on the other hand, simplifies the configuration process by automatically handling many of the underlying settings. While this can be convenient for simple deployments, it may limit customization options for more complex applications.

  4. Monitoring and Logging: AWS Lambda offers built-in monitoring and logging capabilities through AWS CloudWatch. It provides detailed metrics and logs for your functions, allowing you to monitor performance, troubleshoot issues, and set up alerts. Zappa, on the other hand, does not have native monitoring and logging features. However, you can integrate third-party tools like Sentry or Datadog to gather metrics and logs from your Zappa deployments.

  5. Vendor Lock-in: AWS Lambda is a service provided by Amazon Web Services, meaning you are tied to the AWS ecosystem for your serverless computing needs. While AWS offers a wide range of services and resources, this can be limiting if you want to switch to a different cloud provider in the future. Zappa, being an open-source project, provides more flexibility in terms of vendor lock-in. It allows you to deploy to other cloud providers, or even run your serverless applications on your own infrastructure.

  6. Community and Support: AWS Lambda has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums available for developers. It also has official support from Amazon Web Services, ensuring timely bug fixes and updates. Zappa, being an open-source project, also has a vibrant community but may not have the same level of support and documentation as AWS Lambda.

In summary, while AWS Lambda and Zappa are both serverless computing platforms, they differ in terms of pricing models, deployment flexibility, configuration management, monitoring capabilities, vendor lock-in, and community support. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right platform for your specific application needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Lambda, Zappa

Tim
Tim

CTO at Checkly Inc.

Sep 18, 2019

Needs adviceonHerokuHerokuAWS LambdaAWS Lambda

When adding a new feature to Checkly rearchitecting some older piece, I tend to pick Heroku for rolling it out. But not always, because sometimes I pick AWS Lambda . The short story:

  • Developer Experience trumps everything.
  • AWS Lambda is cheap. Up to a limit though. This impact not only your wallet.
  • If you need geographic spread, AWS is lonely at the top.

The setup

Recently, I was doing a brainstorm at a startup here in Berlin on the future of their infrastructure. They were ready to move on from their initial, almost 100% Ec2 + Chef based setup. Everything was on the table. But we crossed out a lot quite quickly:

  • Pure, uncut, self hosted Kubernetes — way too much complexity
  • Managed Kubernetes in various flavors — still too much complexity
  • Zeit — Maybe, but no Docker support
  • Elastic Beanstalk — Maybe, bit old but does the job
  • Heroku
  • Lambda

It became clear a mix of PaaS and FaaS was the way to go. What a surprise! That is exactly what I use for Checkly! But when do you pick which model?

I chopped that question up into the following categories:

  • Developer Experience / DX 🤓
  • Ops Experience / OX 🐂 (?)
  • Cost 💵
  • Lock in 🔐

Read the full post linked below for all details

357k views357k
Comments
Mark
Mark

Nov 2, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft AzureMicrosoft Azure

Need advice on what platform, systems and tools to use.

Evaluating whether to start a new digital business for which we will need to build a website that handles all traffic. Website only right now. May add smartphone apps later. No desktop app will ever be added. Website to serve various countries and languages. B2B and B2C type customers. Need to handle heavy traffic, be low cost, and scale well.

We are open to either build it on AWS or on Microsoft Azure.

Apologies if I'm leaving out some info. My first post. :) Thanks in advance!

133k views133k
Comments
Cory
Cory

Mar 28, 2021

Decided

Netlfiy Functions uses AWS Lambda under the hood, but Netlify adds some nice sugar. The biggest advantage is the local development experience with netlify-cli. This allows you to run your functions locally with local configuration or pull configs from the Netlify dashboard. I built a health-check endpoint in about 2 minutes, and my send-email function in less than an hour.

28.2k views28.2k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Zappa
Zappa

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Zappa makes it super easy to deploy all Python WSGI applications on AWS Lambda + API Gateway. Think of it as "serverless" web hosting for your Python web apps. That means infinite scaling, zero downtime, zero maintenance - and at a fraction of the cost of your current deployments!

Extend other AWS services with custom logic;Build custom back-end services;Completely Automated Administration;Built-in Fault Tolerance;Automatic Scaling;Integrated Security Model;Bring Your Own Code;Pay Per Use;Flexible Resource Model
-
Statistics
Stacks
26.0K
Stacks
68
Followers
18.8K
Followers
99
Votes
432
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 129
    No infrastructure
  • 83
    Cheap
  • 70
    Quick
  • 59
    Stateless
  • 47
    No deploy, no server, great sleep
Cons
  • 7
    Cant execute ruby or go
  • 3
    Compute time limited
  • 1
    Can't execute PHP w/o significant effort
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway

What are some alternatives to AWS Lambda, Zappa?

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

AWS Batch

AWS Batch

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase