StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Transfer
  5. AWS Transfer for SFTP vs WeTransfer

AWS Transfer for SFTP vs WeTransfer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Transfer for SFTP
AWS Transfer for SFTP
Stacks19
Followers14
Votes0
WeTransfer
WeTransfer
Stacks13
Followers17
Votes1

AWS Transfer for SFTP vs WeTransfer: What are the differences?

Introduction

The objective of this task is to provide a comparison between AWS Transfer for SFTP and WeTransfer, highlighting the key differences between the two platforms. This comparison will cover six specific areas to provide a clear understanding of how these services differ from each other.

  1. Supported Features: AWS Transfer for SFTP offers an extensive set of features tailored for secure file transfers, including support for Secure Shell (SSH) access, user management, integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), and adherence to various security protocols and standards. WeTransfer, on the other hand, focuses primarily on simple and convenient file sharing without offering advanced SSH or user management capabilities.

  2. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Transfer for SFTP is built on AWS, which offers a scalable infrastructure that can handle high volumes of file transfers and accommodate fluctuating demand. The service enables users to easily scale their SFTP operations with increased capacity and adapt to changing requirements. As a file transfer service, WeTransfer is designed for simplicity and may not provide the same scalability and flexibility as AWS Transfer for SFTP.

  3. Integration with AWS Services: AWS Transfer for SFTP seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, allowing users to leverage the broad ecosystem of tools and resources available in the AWS platform. This integration enables efficient data transfer, storage, processing, and analysis by connecting with services like Amazon S3, AWS CloudTrail, AWS CloudWatch, and more. WeTransfer, in contrast, primarily focuses on providing an easy-to-use file sharing service and may not have the same level of integration with other cloud services.

  4. Security Features: AWS Transfer for SFTP offers robust security features, including encryption in transit and at rest, support for SSH public key authentication, and integration with AWS Key Management Service (KMS) for enhanced key management. The service also allows users to define fine-grained access controls through IAM policies. WeTransfer, while providing a secure transfer option, may not offer the same level of advanced security features and custom access controls as AWS Transfer for SFTP.

  5. Pricing Structure: AWS Transfer for SFTP follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on their actual usage of the service, including data transfer and storage costs. WeTransfer, on the other hand, primarily offers a freemium model, allowing users to transfer files of limited size for free, but additional features or larger file transfers may require a paid subscription. The pricing structures of these services differ significantly, catering to different user needs and usage scenarios.

  6. Customizability and Control: AWS Transfer for SFTP provides users with a high level of customizability and control through its integration with AWS services, SDKs, and APIs. Users can automate file transfer workflows, implement custom business logic, and leverage the scalability and operational capabilities of AWS. WeTransfer, while providing an intuitive and user-friendly interface, may not offer the same level of customization and control over file transfer processes and workflows.

In summary, AWS Transfer for SFTP stands out with its rich set of features, scalability, and integration with AWS services, providing enhanced security, customizability, and greater control over file transfer operations. WeTransfer, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use for convenient file sharing, but may not provide the same level of advanced features, integrations, and scalability as AWS Transfer for SFTP.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Transfer for SFTP
AWS Transfer for SFTP
WeTransfer
WeTransfer

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol. AWS helps you seamlessly migrate your file transfer workflows to AWS Transfer for SFTP—by integrating with existing authentication systems, and providing DNS routing with Amazon Route 53—so nothing changes for your customers and partners, or their applications.

It is file sharing at its simplest. It works as if your e-mail account can support those large file sizes, you type in your e-mail address and the recipient’s e-mail address, add a message, attach the file, and send.

-
Large-size file transfers in on go; Android and iOS and Mac apps; Extremely simple to use; Non-intrusive ads (Free version); Customizable backgrounds, URLs and emails (Plus); Password protected transfers (Plus); Long term storage; File comments.
Statistics
Stacks
19
Stacks
13
Followers
14
Followers
17
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to use
Integrations
Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Serverless
Serverless
Rackspace Cloud Files
Rackspace Cloud Files
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
cURL
cURL
Dropbox
Dropbox
Box
Box

What are some alternatives to AWS Transfer for SFTP, WeTransfer?

cURL

cURL

Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.

Flurl

Flurl

It is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library for .NET.

FileZilla

FileZilla

It is a powerful and free software for transferring files over the Internet. It is a very popular FTP client and is used by webmasters from all over the world.

WinSCP

WinSCP

It is a popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows. Copy file between a local computer and remote servers using FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, WebDAV or S3 file transfer protocols.

HTTPie

HTTPie

It is a Modern command line HTTP client – user-friendly curl alternative with intuitive UI, JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, etc

Cyberduck

Cyberduck

It is a libre server and cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows with support for FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox.

telegram-download-deamon

telegram-download-deamon

A simple script to automate telegram download of big files. If you have got an Internet connected computer or NAS and you want to automate file downloading from Telegram channels, this daemon is for you.

MEDoc

MEDoc

It is the best assistant in working with all types of documents in electronic form: tax invoices, acts, invoices and reports.

Couchdrop

Couchdrop

Couchdrop is a cloud-native b2b file exchange platform that simplifies secure file transfers across organizational boundaries with zero infrastructure management.

Mover

Mover

Mover is the best way to migrate or back up files between cloud storage providers and traditional servers. We connect to services like Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, OneDrive, FTP, WebDAV, S3 and many others.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase