Axentix vs mini.css

Overview

mini.css

Stacks39

Followers57

Votes4

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks202

Axentix

Stacks2

Followers5

Votes0

GitHub Stars189

Forks17

mini.css vs Axentix: What are the differences?

mini.css: Responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework. mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project; Axentix: Open Source Front end Framework based on CSS Grid. It is an open source Framework based on CSS Grid using HTML, CSS and JS The easy layout control and grid system makes it one of the most easy to learn framework..

mini.css and Axentix belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

mini.css and Axentix are both open source tools. It seems that mini.css with 2.85K GitHub stars and 178 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Axentix with 45 GitHub stars and 6 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

mini.css	Axentix
mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.	It is an open source Framework based on CSS Grid using HTML, CSS and JS. The easy layout control and grid system makes it one of the most easy to learn framework.
-	Easy grid system;Layouts;Color palette;Css-grid;Dependency-free;Easy to learn;Speeds up development
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.0K	GitHub Stars 189
GitHub Forks 202	GitHub Forks 17
Stacks 39	Stacks 2
Followers 57	Followers 5
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Works great on mobile and loads very fast	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to mini.css, Axentix?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

mini.css and Axentix are both open source tools. It seems that mini.css with 2.85K GitHub stars and 178 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Axentix with 45 GitHub stars and 6 GitHub forks.

Axentix vs mini.css