StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Baget vs NuGet

Baget vs NuGet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NuGet
NuGet
Stacks10.2K
Followers172
Votes0
Baget
Baget
Stacks13
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks755

Baget vs NuGet: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here is a comparison of the key differences between Baget and NuGet.

  1. Hosting Environment: Baget is a lightweight NuGet-compatible package server that can be self-hosted in containers, virtual machines, or on bare metal, making it a flexible option for hosting packages. On the other hand, NuGet is a package manager designed to allow developers to create, publish, and consume packages within the Visual Studio development environment.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Baget focuses on providing a simple and lightweight package server solution, which makes it suitable for small-scale scenarios or when resources are limited. In contrast, NuGet, with its integration into Visual Studio and extensive feature set, offers more scalability and performance options, making it better suited for larger-scale projects or enterprise scenarios.

  3. Authentication and Authorization: Baget supports basic authentication for securing access to the package server using a username and password. It can also integrate with external authentication providers via OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0. On the other hand, NuGet offers various authentication and authorization options, including Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, personal access tokens, and more, providing greater flexibility and control over access to packages.

  4. Package Indexing: Baget does not support package indexing by default, which means that search functionality may not be as efficient or advanced compared to NuGet. NuGet, on the other hand, provides comprehensive package indexing and search capabilities, allowing developers to easily find and discover packages based on various search criteria.

  5. Package Lifecycle Management: Baget does not provide built-in support for package version management, deprecation, or sunset policies. It primarily focuses on package hosting and distribution. In contrast, NuGet offers advanced package lifecycle management features, allowing package authors to publish multiple versions, deprecate or retire older versions, and manage the overall lifecycle of their packages with greater control.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Baget, being a relatively new open-source project, has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to NuGet. While it offers the core functionality required for hosting packages, NuGet benefits from a larger community, extensive documentation, and an ecosystem of tools and plugins built around it, which can enhance the development and consumption experience.

In summary, Baget is a lightweight, self-hosted package server with limited scalability options and a focus on simplicity, while NuGet is a feature-rich package manager tightly integrated with Visual Studio, offering advanced scalability, authentication options, package indexing, lifecycle management, and a larger community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NuGet
NuGet
Baget
Baget

A free and open-source package manager designed for the Microsoft development platform. It is also distributed as a Visual Studio extension.

It is a lightweight NuGet and symbol server. It is open source, cross-platform, and cloud ready.

-
Cross-platform; Dockerized; Cloud ready; Supports read-through caching; Can index the entirety of nuget.org
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
755
Stacks
10.2K
Stacks
13
Followers
172
Followers
7
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    Best package (and maybe only 1) management for .NET
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
.NET
.NET
Docker
Docker
Aliyun
Aliyun

What are some alternatives to NuGet, Baget?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana