StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Beego vs Gin Gonic

Beego vs Gin Gonic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic
Stacks393
Followers340
Votes16
GitHub Stars86.8K
Forks8.5K
Beego
Beego
Stacks52
Followers98
Votes0
GitHub Stars744
Forks183

Beego vs Gin Gonic: What are the differences?

Introduction In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Beego and Gin Gonic, two popular Golang web frameworks. Both frameworks are lightweight, efficient, and provide various features to develop web applications. However, they differ in several aspects that make them unique in their own ways.

  1. Design Philosophy: Beego follows a full-stack MVC (Model-View-Controller) design pattern, providing a clear separation of concerns. It includes built-in ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) support, routing, template engine, and session management. On the other hand, Gin Gonic follows a minimalist design approach, focusing on simplicity and performance. It provides basic routing functionality and leaves other accommodations to third-party libraries or plugins.

  2. Performance: In terms of performance, Gin Gonic is known for its high speed and low memory footprint. It achieves this by utilizing a minimalistic design and optimizing the core functionalities. In contrast, Beego is relatively heavier and may have slightly lower performance compared to Gin Gonic.

  3. Learning Curve: Beego provides a comprehensive set of features out-of-the-box, making it beginner-friendly but with a steeper learning curve. It has a well-defined directory structure and comes with built-in tools for code generation, making the development process efficient. On the other hand, Gin Gonic follows a minimalist approach, making it easier to learn and understand, especially for developers already familiar with Go programming language.

  4. Flexibility: Beego offers more flexibility in terms of configuration and customization. It provides a range of configurations options, allowing developers to tune the framework as per their specific requirements. Beego also has a mature community and a variety of plugins available for extending its features. In contrast, Gin Gonic has a simpler configuration model, but it may lack certain additional features or extensions.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Beego has a comparatively larger community and ecosystem, with a wider presence and support. It has been around for a longer time and has a well-established user base, resulting in a rich collection of resources, documentation, and community support. Gin Gonic, although relatively newer, has gained popularity for its simplicity and performance, with an active community, but may have a smaller ecosystem compared to Beego.

  6. Documentation: Beego has detailed and comprehensive documentation, covering various aspects of the framework, along with examples and tutorials. It provides a smooth learning path for beginners and extensive reference material for advanced usage. Gin Gonic also has good documentation, but it may be relatively less extensive compared to Beego.

In summary, Beego and Gin Gonic are both efficient Golang web frameworks, but they differ in design philosophy, performance, learning curve, flexibility, community support, and documentation. Developers can choose between them based on their specific requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic
Beego
Beego

It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.

It is a RESTful HTTP framework for the rapid development of Go applications including APIs, web apps and backend services with integrated Go specific features such as interfaces and struct embedding.

-
Interfaces; Struct embedding; Rapid Development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
86.8K
GitHub Stars
744
GitHub Forks
8.5K
GitHub Forks
183
Stacks
393
Stacks
52
Followers
340
Followers
98
Votes
16
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Hight performance
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Low performance
  • 1
    No wildcard routing
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Golang
Golang
Sentry
Sentry
Laravel
Laravel
Stream
Stream
Python
Python
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
KeyCDN
KeyCDN

What are some alternatives to Gin Gonic, Beego?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase