StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Behat vs PHPUnit

Behat vs PHPUnit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
Stacks2.8K
Followers287
Votes14
GitHub Stars20.0K
Forks2.2K
Behat
Behat
Stacks179
Followers65
Votes2
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks582

Behat vs PHPUnit: What are the differences?

Introduction

Behat and PHPUnit are two popular testing frameworks used in the software development industry. While both frameworks are used for testing software applications, they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Programming Language: Behat is primarily used for testing behavior-driven development (BDD) scenarios and is written in PHP. It focuses on testing the behavior of the software by using human-readable language in its test cases. On the other hand, PHPUnit is a unit testing framework also written in PHP. It is mainly used for testing individual units of code or functions in isolation.

  2. Testing Level: Behat is designed for high-level end-to-end testing, often called acceptance or black-box testing. It simulates the end-user interactions with the application and ensures that the software meets the specified requirements. PHPUnit, on the other hand, is used for unit testing, which aims to test the smallest components or units of code, such as functions or classes.

  3. Test Syntax: Behat uses a natural language syntax called Gherkin to define its test scenarios. Gherkin provides a way to express the expected behavior of the software in a structured format that is easy to understand for both technical and non-technical stakeholders. PHPUnit, on the other hand, uses a more traditional programming syntax to define the test cases.

  4. Test Granularity: Behat tests are typically written at a higher level of granularity, focusing on testing the application's features and user interactions. It allows for testing end-to-end scenarios, such as simulating user journeys through different pages or actions. PHPUnit tests, on the other hand, are more focused on testing the functionality of specific units of code and are often written at a lower level of granularity.

  5. Integration with Frameworks: Behat is designed to integrate well with popular PHP frameworks, such as Symfony and Laravel. It provides built-in support for these frameworks and allows for easy integration with their components and libraries. PHPUnit, on the other hand, is a standalone testing framework that can be used with any PHP project, regardless of the framework being used.

  6. Test Execution: Behat tests are typically executed by running the Behat command-line interface (CLI) command, which reads the test scenarios defined in feature files and executes them sequentially. PHPUnit tests, on the other hand, are executed by running the PHPUnit CLI command, which automatically discovers and executes all the defined unit tests in a project.

In summary, Behat and PHPUnit are both testing frameworks used in software development, but they differ in programming language, testing level, test syntax, test granularity, integration with frameworks, and test execution methods.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
Behat
Behat

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

It is an open source Behavior-Driven Development framework for PHP. It is a tool to support you in delivering software that matters through continuous communication, deliberate discovery and test-automation.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.0K
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
582
Stacks
2.8K
Stacks
179
Followers
287
Followers
65
Votes
14
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    TDD Unit Testing
  • 2
    Software Quality
  • 2
    TDD Integration Testing
  • 2
    TDD Acceptance Testing
  • 1
    Unit Testing
Cons
  • 1
    Mocked services require more effort and understanding
Pros
  • 1
    Easy Ubiquitous language integration reusing code
  • 1
    BDD Acceptance Testing

What are some alternatives to PHPUnit, Behat?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana