StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. SpecFlow vs behave

SpecFlow vs behave

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SpecFlow
SpecFlow
Stacks153
Followers105
Votes0
behave
behave
Stacks67
Followers119
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks656

SpecFlow vs behave: What are the differences?

Introduction

SpecFlow and Behave are both popular testing frameworks used for Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) in software testing. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Test Structure: SpecFlow uses the Gherkin language, which has a specific structure that includes Given, When, and Then clauses. This structure helps in writing test scenarios in a human-readable format. On the other hand, Behave uses a flexible plain-text structure that allows testers to define and organize their tests in any way they prefer.

  2. Language Support: SpecFlow primarily supports .NET languages such as C# and VB.NET, while Behave is primarily used with Python. This means that developers who are already familiar with a specific programming language may prefer one framework over the other based on their language expertise.

  3. Integration with IDE: SpecFlow integrates well with popular IDEs like Visual Studio, allowing developers to easily write and execute tests from within their development environment. Behave, on the other hand, may require additional plugins or setups to achieve a similar level of integration.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: SpecFlow has a larger and more established community compared to Behave, which means there are more resources, tutorials, and support available for users. SpecFlow also has a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions that can enhance its functionality. Behave, being a Python-based framework, may have a smaller community and fewer available resources.

  5. Reporting and Documentation: SpecFlow provides extensive reporting capabilities, with features like HTML reports, traceability matrices, and test execution details. Behave, on the other hand, may not have as rich reporting capabilities out-of-the-box, although it can be extended with custom reporting plugins.

  6. Platform Support: SpecFlow is primarily focused on .NET platforms and may not have extensive support for non-.NET technologies. Behave, being Python-based, can be used to test a wider range of technologies and platforms beyond just .NET.

In summary, SpecFlow and Behave have differences in test structure, language support, IDE integration, community ecosystem, reporting options, and platform support. Depending on the specific requirements and expertise of the development team, one framework may be a better fit than the other.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SpecFlow
SpecFlow
behave
behave

It is used to define, manage and automatically execute human-readable acceptance tests in .NET projects. Writing easily understandable tests is a cornerstone of the BDD paradigm and also helps build up a living documentation of your system.

It is behaviour-driven development, Python style. It uses tests written in a natural language style, backed up by Python code.

-
bdd; tests; tdd
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
656
Stacks
153
Stacks
67
Followers
105
Followers
119
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Django
Django
Flask
Flask

What are some alternatives to SpecFlow, behave?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana