StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Blade vs CakePHP

Blade vs CakePHP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CakePHP
CakePHP
Stacks672
Followers401
Votes137
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks3.4K
Blade
Blade
Stacks50
Followers83
Votes0

Blade vs CakePHP: What are the differences?

Introduction

Blade and CakePHP are both popular PHP frameworks used for web development. They have unique features and differences that cater to specific developer preferences and project requirements.

  1. Template Engine: Blade utilizes the Blade templating engine which provides a clean, simple syntax for writing templates, making it easier for developers to create and manage their views. On the other hand, CakePHP uses the CakePHP View class for templating, which offers a more structured approach but may be less flexible compared to Blade.

  2. ORM (Object-Relational Mapping): CakePHP comes with its own ORM system which simplifies interactions with databases by mapping database tables to PHP objects. In contrast, Blade does not have a built-in ORM, allowing developers the freedom to choose their preferred ORM library or customize their database interactions as needed.

  3. Routing: CakePHP has a powerful routing system that allows for flexible, dynamic routing configurations based on specified patterns. Blade, however, follows a simpler routing approach, which may be suitable for smaller projects with less complex routing requirements.

  4. Documentation: CakePHP is well-known for its comprehensive and detailed documentation which makes it easier for developers to learn and use the framework effectively. Blade, while also having documentation available, may not be as extensive or detailed as CakePHP’s documentation.

  5. Modularity and Components: CakePHP follows the concept of components, behaviors, and helpers, which are reusable and modular building blocks for applications. Blade, on the other hand, provides flexibility through its template inheritance and sections, allowing for easier maintenance and organization of views in the application.

  6. Community Support: CakePHP has a large and active community of developers and contributors, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and support for users. Blade, while also having a supportive community, may not have the same level of resources or plugins available compared to CakePHP.

In Summary, Blade and CakePHP differ in their templating engines, ORM systems, routing mechanisms, documentation, modularity, and community support, catering to developers with varying preferences and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP
CakePHP
Blade
Blade

It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.

Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
672
Stacks
50
Followers
401
Followers
83
Votes
137
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Open source
  • 25
    Really rapid framework
  • 19
    Good code organization
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 10
    Security best practices
Cons
  • 1
    Robust Baking Tool
  • 1
    Follows Good Programming Practices
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, Blade?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase