Alternatives to Browserling logo

Alternatives to Browserling

BrowserStack, CrossBrowserTesting , Selenium, Karma, and LambdaTest are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Browserling.
12
41
+ 1
0

What is Browserling and what are its top alternatives?

We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.
Browserling is a tool in the Browser Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Browserling

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real browsers and devices in a single cloud platform—and at scale. ...

  • CrossBrowserTesting
    CrossBrowserTesting

    It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base. ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Karma
    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • Sauce Labs
    Sauce Labs

    Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready. ...

  • WebdriverIO
    WebdriverIO

    WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read. ...

Browserling alternatives & related posts

BrowserStack logo

BrowserStack

2.7K
1.9K
434
BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications
2.7K
1.9K
+ 1
434
PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 131
    Multiple browsers
  • 71
    Ease of use
  • 59
    Real browsers
  • 40
    Ability to use it locally
  • 23
    Good price
  • 17
    Great web interface
  • 15
    IE support
  • 13
    Official mobile emulators
  • 12
    Cloud-based access
  • 11
    Instant access
  • 8
    Real mobile devices
  • 5
    Multiple Desktop OS
  • 5
    Selenium compatible
  • 4
    Screenshots
  • 4
    Can be used for Testing and E2E
  • 3
    Video of test runs
  • 3
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 2
    Webdriver compatible
  • 2
    Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
  • 2
    Many browsers
  • 2
    Favourites
  • 1
    Free for Open Source
  • 1
    Cypress Compatible
CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions

related BrowserStack posts

Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 220.6K views

I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

See more
CrossBrowserTesting  logo

CrossBrowserTesting

34
39
0
A cross browser testing tools for devices and real browsers
34
39
+ 1
0
PROS OF CROSSBROWSERTESTING
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF CROSSBROWSERTESTING
      Be the first to leave a con

      related CrossBrowserTesting posts

      Selenium logo

      Selenium

      12.8K
      10.2K
      521
      Web Browser Automation
      12.8K
      10.2K
      + 1
      521
      PROS OF SELENIUM
      • 171
        Automates browsers
      • 154
        Testing
      • 101
        Essential tool for running test automation
      • 24
        Remote Control
      • 24
        Record-Playback
      • 8
        Data crawling
      • 7
        Supports end to end testing
      • 6
        Functional testing
      • 6
        Easy set up
      • 4
        The Most flexible monitoring system
      • 3
        Easy to integrate with build tools
      • 3
        End to End Testing
      • 2
        Integration Tests
      • 2
        Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
      • 2
        Record and playback
      • 2
        Compatible with Python
      • 2
        Easy to scale
      • 0
        Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
      CONS OF SELENIUM
      • 8
        Flaky tests
      • 4
        Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
      • 1
        Update browser drivers

      related Selenium posts

      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 1.6M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Benjamin Poon
      QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 877.9K views

      For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

      With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

      See more
      Karma logo

      Karma

      1K
      580
      181
      Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
      1K
      580
      + 1
      181
      PROS OF KARMA
      • 61
        Test Runner
      • 35
        Open source
      • 27
        Continuous Integration
      • 22
        Great for running tests
      • 18
        Test on Real Devices
      • 11
        Backed by google
      • 5
        Easy Debugging
      • 2
        Remote Control
      CONS OF KARMA
      • 1
        Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
      • 1
        Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

      related Karma posts

      Sai Chaitanya Mankala
      Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 129.3K views

      Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

      We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

      See more

      Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

      Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

      See more
      LambdaTest logo

      LambdaTest

      527
      169
      202
      LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
      527
      169
      + 1
      202
      PROS OF LAMBDATEST
      • 16
        Pocket friendly pricing
      • 13
        Good Performance
      • 12
        Cross browser testing
      • 12
        Integration with Bitbucket
      • 12
        Integration with Gitlab
      • 11
        Great support
      • 11
        Integration with Jira
      • 11
        Integration with GitHub
      • 10
        Integration with Trello
      • 10
        Clean UI and Easy to use
      • 10
        Integration with Slack
      • 10
        Integration with Asana
      • 8
        Pre-installed developer tools
      • 8
        Integration with Hive
      • 8
        IE and Edge support
      • 6
        Local app testing
      • 6
        Multiple Browsers
      • 5
        Integration with Teamwork
      • 5
        Integration with VSTS
      • 4
        Real time testing feature is flawless
      • 3
        Selenium automation
      • 3
        Faster Speed
      • 3
        Up-to-date Browser collection
      • 2
        Robust Selenium Grid
      • 2
        24/7 Customer Chat Support
      • 1
        Real devices
      CONS OF LAMBDATEST
        Be the first to leave a con

        related LambdaTest posts

        Sarah Elson
        Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 388.8K views

        @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

        See more
        Sarah Elson
        Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 100K views
        Shared insights
        on
        SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
        at
        Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

        Selenium LambdaTest

        See more
        LambdaTest logo

        LambdaTest

        527
        169
        202
        LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
        527
        169
        + 1
        202
        PROS OF LAMBDATEST
        • 16
          Pocket friendly pricing
        • 13
          Good Performance
        • 12
          Cross browser testing
        • 12
          Integration with Bitbucket
        • 12
          Integration with Gitlab
        • 11
          Great support
        • 11
          Integration with Jira
        • 11
          Integration with GitHub
        • 10
          Integration with Trello
        • 10
          Clean UI and Easy to use
        • 10
          Integration with Slack
        • 10
          Integration with Asana
        • 8
          Pre-installed developer tools
        • 8
          Integration with Hive
        • 8
          IE and Edge support
        • 6
          Local app testing
        • 6
          Multiple Browsers
        • 5
          Integration with Teamwork
        • 5
          Integration with VSTS
        • 4
          Real time testing feature is flawless
        • 3
          Selenium automation
        • 3
          Faster Speed
        • 3
          Up-to-date Browser collection
        • 2
          Robust Selenium Grid
        • 2
          24/7 Customer Chat Support
        • 1
          Real devices
        CONS OF LAMBDATEST
          Be the first to leave a con

          related LambdaTest posts

          Sarah Elson
          Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 388.8K views

          @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

          See more
          Sarah Elson
          Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 100K views
          Shared insights
          on
          SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
          at
          Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

          Selenium LambdaTest

          See more
          Sauce Labs logo

          Sauce Labs

          303
          420
          438
          Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
          303
          420
          + 1
          438
          PROS OF SAUCE LABS
          • 60
            Selenium-compatible
          • 46
            Webdriver compatible
          • 35
            Video recordings of every test
          • 31
            Qa
          • 29
            Mobile support
          • 26
            Any programming language
          • 23
            Developer tools
          • 21
            Test local and firewalled servers
          • 20
            Jenkins integration
          • 18
            Pristine VMs
          • 17
            CI Compatible
          • 11
            Appium support
          • 9
            Parallel testing
          • 8
            Rapid environment preparation
          • 8
            Mobile device support
          • 7
            Easy testing on almost any device
          • 7
            Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
          • 6
            Secure testing and easy setup
          • 5
            Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
          • 5
            Quick support response
          • 4
            Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
          • 4
            Easy to setup and understand,
          • 3
            Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
          • 3
            Maintained browser matrix
          • 3
            Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
          • 2
            Efficient tool to verify product quality
          • 2
            Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
          • 2
            Hany for platform testing
          • 2
            Great documentation
          • 2
            Generous free trial
          • 2
            Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
          • 2
            Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
          • 2
            Simplicity of Sauce-connect
          • 1
            Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
          • 1
            It's great for my QA work
          • 1
            Awesome tech support
          • 1
            Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
          • 1
            Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
          • 1
            Depth of integrations
          • 1
            Because of its cloud based support for appium
          • 1
            Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
          • 1
            QE support
          • 1
            Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
          • 1
            Secure testing
          • 1
            Cheaper than browserstack
          • 1
            Stable
          • 0
            Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs
          CONS OF SAUCE LABS
          • 2
            Relatively slow
          • 2
            Expensive

          related Sauce Labs posts

          Shared insights
          on
          Sauce LabsSauce LabsSeleniumSelenium

          I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

          I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

          See more
          Zarema Khalilova
          Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 220.6K views

          I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

          See more
          WebdriverIO logo

          WebdriverIO

          232
          453
          37
          Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js
          232
          453
          + 1
          37
          PROS OF WEBDRIVERIO
          • 11
            Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
          • 8
            Great community
          • 8
            Open Source
          • 7
            Easy to setup
          • 3
            Best solution for broad browser support
          CONS OF WEBDRIVERIO
          • 8
            High maintenance

          related WebdriverIO posts

          Raziel Alron
          Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 252.3K views

          Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

          See more
          Kevin Roulleau
          QA Engineer Freelance at happn · | 5 upvotes · 202.1K views

          I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

          See more