Alternatives to Browserling logo

Alternatives to Browserling

BrowserStack, CrossBrowserTesting , Selenium, Karma, and LambdaTest are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Browserling.
10
33
+ 1
0

What is Browserling and what are its top alternatives?

We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.
Browserling is a tool in the Browser Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Browserling

  • BrowserStack

    BrowserStack

    Live, Web-Based Browser Testing Instant access to all real mobile and desktop browsers. Say goodbye to your lab of devices and virtual machines. ...

  • CrossBrowserTesting

    CrossBrowserTesting

    It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base. ...

  • Selenium

    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Karma

    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • LambdaTest

    LambdaTest

    A cloud-based automated cross browser testing platform. LambdaTest allows you to perform automation testing on a scalable, secure, and reliable Selenium Grid online. It provides access to the network of 2000+ real browsers and OSes. ...

  • LambdaTest

    LambdaTest

    A cloud-based automated cross browser testing platform. LambdaTest allows you to perform automation testing on a scalable, secure, and reliable Selenium Grid online. It provides access to the network of 2000+ real browsers and OSes. ...

  • Sauce Labs

    Sauce Labs

    Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready. ...

  • WebdriverIO

    WebdriverIO

    WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read. ...

Browserling alternatives & related posts

BrowserStack logo

BrowserStack

2.6K
1.8K
423
Instant access to a lab of 2000+ real mobile and desktop browsers for testing.
2.6K
1.8K
+ 1
423
PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 127
    Multiple browsers
  • 69
    Ease of use
  • 58
    Real browsers
  • 40
    Ability to use it locally
  • 22
    Good price
  • 17
    Great web interface
  • 15
    IE support
  • 13
    Official mobile emulators
  • 12
    Cloud-based access
  • 11
    Instant access
  • 6
    Real mobile devices
  • 5
    Multiple Desktop OS
  • 4
    Can be used for Testing and E2E
  • 4
    Selenium compatible
  • 4
    Screenshots
  • 3
    Video of test runs
  • 3
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 2
    Many browsers
  • 2
    Webdriver compatible
  • 2
    Favourites
  • 2
    Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
  • 1
    Free for Open Source
  • 1
    Cypress Compatible
CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 1
    Very limited choice of minor versions

related BrowserStack posts

Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare | 6 upvotes 路 177.1K views

I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

See more
CrossBrowserTesting  logo

CrossBrowserTesting

26
28
0
A cross browser testing tools for devices and real browsers
26
28
+ 1
0
PROS OF CROSSBROWSERTESTING
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF CROSSBROWSERTESTING
      Be the first to leave a con

      related CrossBrowserTesting posts

      Selenium logo

      Selenium

      9.9K
      7.4K
      513
      Web Browser Automation
      9.9K
      7.4K
      + 1
      513
      PROS OF SELENIUM
      • 167
        Automates browsers
      • 152
        Testing
      • 100
        Essential tool for running test automation
      • 24
        Record-Playback
      • 24
        Remote Control
      • 8
        Data crawling
      • 7
        Supports end to end testing
      • 6
        Functional testing
      • 6
        Easy set up
      • 3
        Easy to integrate with build tools
      • 3
        The Most flexible monitoring system
      • 3
        End to End Testing
      • 2
        Integration Tests
      • 2
        Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
      • 2
        Record and playback
      • 2
        Compatible with Python
      • 2
        Easy to scale
      • 0
        Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
      CONS OF SELENIUM
      • 5
        Flaky tests
      • 1
        Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)

      related Selenium posts

      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha | 27 upvotes 路 933.8K views

      When you think about test automation, it鈥檚 crucial to make it everyone鈥檚 responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Benjamin Poon
      QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital | 8 upvotes 路 668K views

      For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

      With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

      See more
      Karma logo

      Karma

      838
      525
      177
      Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
      838
      525
      + 1
      177
      PROS OF KARMA
      • 60
        Test Runner
      • 33
        Open source
      • 27
        Continuous Integration
      • 22
        Great for running tests
      • 17
        Test on Real Devices
      • 11
        Backed by google
      • 5
        Easy Debugging
      • 2
        Remote Control
      CONS OF KARMA
      • 1
        Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
      • 1
        Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

      related Karma posts

      Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

      Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

      See more
      LambdaTest logo

      LambdaTest

      498
      113
      161
      Perform Automated Cross Browser Testing on 2000+ Real Browsers and Operating System Online
      498
      113
      + 1
      161
      PROS OF LAMBDATEST
      • 11
        Pocket friendly pricing
      • 10
        Integration with Gitlab
      • 10
        Good Performance
      • 10
        Integration with Bitbucket
      • 9
        Integration with Jira
      • 9
        Great support
      • 9
        Integration with GitHub
      • 9
        Integration with Trello
      • 9
        Integration with Slack
      • 9
        Integration with Asana
      • 9
        Cross browser testing
      • 8
        Clean UI and Easy to use
      • 7
        Integration with Hive
      • 7
        IE and Edge support
      • 7
        Pre-installed developer tools
      • 5
        Local app testing
      • 4
        Integration with VSTS
      • 4
        Integration with Teamwork
      • 4
        Multiple Browsers
      • 3
        Real time testing feature is flawless
      • 2
        Faster Speed
      • 2
        Selenium automation
      • 2
        Up-to-date Browser collection
      • 1
        Robust Selenium Grid
      • 1
        24/7 Customer Chat Support
      CONS OF LAMBDATEST
        Be the first to leave a con

        related LambdaTest posts

        Sarah Elson
        Product Growth at LambdaTest | 4 upvotes 路 280.9K views

        @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

        See more
        Sarah Elson
        Product Growth at LambdaTest | 2 upvotes 路 71.2K views
        Shared insights
        on
        Selenium
        LambdaTest
        at
        Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

        Selenium LambdaTest

        See more
        LambdaTest logo

        LambdaTest

        498
        113
        161
        Perform Automated Cross Browser Testing on 2000+ Real Browsers and Operating System Online
        498
        113
        + 1
        161
        PROS OF LAMBDATEST
        • 11
          Pocket friendly pricing
        • 10
          Integration with Gitlab
        • 10
          Good Performance
        • 10
          Integration with Bitbucket
        • 9
          Integration with Jira
        • 9
          Great support
        • 9
          Integration with GitHub
        • 9
          Integration with Trello
        • 9
          Integration with Slack
        • 9
          Integration with Asana
        • 9
          Cross browser testing
        • 8
          Clean UI and Easy to use
        • 7
          Integration with Hive
        • 7
          IE and Edge support
        • 7
          Pre-installed developer tools
        • 5
          Local app testing
        • 4
          Integration with VSTS
        • 4
          Integration with Teamwork
        • 4
          Multiple Browsers
        • 3
          Real time testing feature is flawless
        • 2
          Faster Speed
        • 2
          Selenium automation
        • 2
          Up-to-date Browser collection
        • 1
          Robust Selenium Grid
        • 1
          24/7 Customer Chat Support
        CONS OF LAMBDATEST
          Be the first to leave a con

          related LambdaTest posts

          Sarah Elson
          Product Growth at LambdaTest | 4 upvotes 路 280.9K views

          @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

          See more
          Sarah Elson
          Product Growth at LambdaTest | 2 upvotes 路 71.2K views
          Shared insights
          on
          Selenium
          LambdaTest
          at
          Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

          Selenium LambdaTest

          See more
          Sauce Labs logo

          Sauce Labs

          288
          362
          436
          Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
          288
          362
          + 1
          436
          PROS OF SAUCE LABS
          • 59
            Selenium-compatible
          • 46
            Webdriver compatible
          • 35
            Video recordings of every test
          • 31
            Qa
          • 29
            Mobile support
          • 26
            Any programming language
          • 23
            Developer tools
          • 21
            Test local and firewalled servers
          • 20
            Jenkins integration
          • 18
            Pristine VMs
          • 17
            CI Compatible
          • 11
            Appium support
          • 9
            Parallel testing
          • 8
            Rapid environment preparation
          • 7
            Easy testing on almost any device
          • 7
            Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
          • 7
            Mobile device support
          • 6
            Secure testing and easy setup
          • 5
            Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
          • 5
            Quick support response
          • 4
            Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
          • 4
            Easy to setup and understand,
          • 3
            Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
          • 3
            Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
          • 3
            Maintained browser matrix
          • 2
            Generous free trial
          • 2
            Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
          • 2
            Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
          • 2
            Hany for platform testing
          • 2
            Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
          • 2
            Great documentation
          • 2
            Simplicity of Sauce-connect
          • 2
            Efficient tool to verify product quality
          • 1
            It's great for my QA work
          • 1
            QE support
          • 1
            Secure testing
          • 1
            Stable
          • 1
            Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
          • 1
            Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
          • 1
            Depth of integrations
          • 1
            Because of its cloud based support for appium
          • 1
            Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
          • 1
            Cheaper than browserstack
          • 1
            Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
          • 1
            Awesome tech support
          • 1
            Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
          • 0
            Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs
          CONS OF SAUCE LABS
          • 2
            Expensive
          • 1
            Relatively slow

          related Sauce Labs posts

          Shared insights
          on
          Sauce Labs
          Selenium

          I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

          I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

          See more
          Zarema Khalilova
          Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare | 6 upvotes 路 177.1K views

          I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

          See more
          WebdriverIO logo

          WebdriverIO

          187
          306
          35
          Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js
          187
          306
          + 1
          35
          PROS OF WEBDRIVERIO
          • 10
            Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
          • 8
            Great community
          • 8
            Open Source
          • 7
            Easy to setup
          • 2
            Best solution for broad browser support
          CONS OF WEBDRIVERIO
          • 6
            High maintenance

          related WebdriverIO posts

          Raziel Alron
          Automation Engineer at Tipalti | 7 upvotes 路 70.6K views

          Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

          See more
          Kevin Roulleau
          QA Engineer Freelance at happn | 5 upvotes 路 149.8K views

          I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

          See more