StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Logging Tools
  5. Bunyan vs Zap

Bunyan vs Zap

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zap
Zap
Stacks10
Followers33
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.9K
Forks1.5K
Bunyan
Bunyan
Stacks315
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.2K
Forks517

Zap vs Bunyan: What are the differences?

Developers describe Zap as "Blazing fast, structured, leveled logging in Go (by Uber)". Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API. On the other hand, Bunyan is detailed as "A logging module for node.js services". It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.).

Zap and Bunyan can be categorized as "Logging" tools.

Zap and Bunyan are both open source tools. Zap with 7.81K GitHub stars and 597 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Bunyan with 5.96K GitHub stars and 488 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zap
Zap
Bunyan
Bunyan

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

-
Elegant log method API; Extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.); bunyan CLI for pretty-printing and filtering of Bunyan logs; simple include of log call source location (file, line, function) with src: true; lightweight specialization of Logger instances with log.child; Custom rendering of logged objects with "serializers"; Runtime log snooping via DTrace support; Support for a few runtime environments: Node.js, Browserify, Webpack, NW.js
Statistics
GitHub Stars
23.9K
GitHub Stars
7.2K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
517
Stacks
10
Stacks
315
Followers
33
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Node.js
Node.js
Restify
Restify
Webpack
Webpack
Browserify
Browserify

What are some alternatives to Zap, Bunyan?

Seq

Seq

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Loki

Loki

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Log4j

Log4j

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Castle Core

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Fluent Bit

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

NanoLog

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

LogDevice

LogDevice

LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.

SwiftyBeaver

SwiftyBeaver

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana