Alternatives to Bytescale logo

Alternatives to Bytescale

Cloudinary, Google Drive, CloudFlare, Dropbox, and Amazon CloudFront are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Bytescale.
10
21

What is Bytescale and what are its top alternatives?

Bytescale is a cloud computing platform that offers scalable and flexible hosting solutions to businesses of all sizes. Key features of Bytescale include high uptime, customizable server configurations, automated backups, and 24/7 customer support. However, some limitations of Bytescale include limited data center locations and potentially higher costs compared to other hosting providers.

  1. DigitalOcean: DigitalOcean is a popular cloud hosting provider known for its simplicity and developer-friendly features. Key features include SSD storage, easy-to-use control panel, and a vast library of tutorials. Pros of DigitalOcean include competitive pricing and a user-friendly interface, while some cons include limited data center locations.

  2. Linode: Linode is a cloud hosting provider that offers high-performance virtual servers for developers and businesses. Key features of Linode include SSD storage, instant provisioning, and a robust API. Pros of Linode include competitive pricing and excellent customer support, while cons include limited managed services.

  3. Vultr: Vultr is a cloud computing provider that offers cloud servers with high-performance SSD storage. Key features of Vultr include hourly billing, multiple data centers worldwide, and a user-friendly control panel. Pros of Vultr include competitive pricing and fast server deployment, while some cons include limited support options.

  4. AWS Lightsail: AWS Lightsail is a simplified cloud computing platform offered by Amazon Web Services. Key features include simple virtual private servers, easy scaling, and integration with other AWS services. Pros of AWS Lightsail include seamless AWS integration and cost-effectiveness, while cons include potentially higher costs for additional services.

  5. Google Cloud Platform: Google Cloud Platform is a suite of cloud computing services offered by Google. Key features of GCP include flexible pricing, global data centers, and advanced machine learning capabilities. Pros of Google Cloud Platform include robust security features and integration with Google's ecosystem, while cons include complex pricing structure for beginners.

  6. Azure Virtual Machines: Azure Virtual Machines is a part of the Microsoft Azure cloud computing platform offering scalable virtual servers. Key features of Azure Virtual Machines include various operating system options, high availability, and comprehensive monitoring tools. Pros of Azure Virtual Machines include seamless integration with other Azure services and extensive compliance certifications, while cons include potential scalability limitations.

  7. UpCloud: UpCloud is a European cloud hosting provider known for its high-performance infrastructure and reliability. Key features of UpCloud include MaxIOPS storage technology, real-time monitoring, and customizable server configurations. Pros of UpCloud include high-performance servers and competitive pricing, while cons include limited data center locations.

  8. Hetzner Cloud: Hetzner Cloud is a cloud hosting provider offering affordable and high-performance virtual servers. Key features of Hetzner Cloud include SSD storage, flexible pricing, and simple server management. Pros of Hetzner Cloud include cost-effectiveness and reliable infrastructure, while cons include limited support options.

  9. IBM Cloud: IBM Cloud is a cloud computing platform that offers a variety of services including virtual servers, AI tools, and blockchain solutions. Key features of IBM Cloud include enterprise-grade security, hybrid cloud options, and a global network of data centers. Pros of IBM Cloud include strong security measures and advanced AI capabilities, while cons include complex pricing structure for beginners.

  10. Kamatera: Kamatera is a cloud hosting provider offering scalable cloud servers with high-performance SSD storage. Key features of Kamatera include hourly billing, customizable server configurations, and a global network of data centers. Pros of Kamatera include flexible pricing options and reliable infrastructure, while some cons include limited advanced features compared to other providers.

Top Alternatives to Bytescale

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

  • Incapsula
    Incapsula

    Through an application-aware, global content delivery network (CDN), Incapsula provides any website and web application with best-of-breed security, DDoS protection, load balancing and failover solutions. ...

Bytescale alternatives & related posts

Cloudinary logo

Cloudinary

598
594
179
An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
598
594
+ 1
179
PROS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 37
    Easy setup
  • 31
    Fast image delivery
  • 26
    Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
  • 21
    Free tier
  • 11
    Heroku add-on
  • 9
    Reduce development costs
  • 7
    Amazing support
  • 6
    Heroku plugin
  • 6
    Great libraries for all languages
  • 6
    Virtually limitless scale
  • 5
    Easy to integrate with Rails
  • 4
    Cheap
  • 3
    Shot setup time
  • 3
    Very easy setup
  • 2
    Solves alot of image problems.
  • 1
    Best in the market and includes free plan
  • 1
    Extremely generous free pricing tier
  • 0
    Fast image delivery, vast array
CONS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 5
    Paid plan is expensive

related Cloudinary posts

Google Drive logo

Google Drive

81.9K
68.1K
2.1K
A safe place for all your files
81.9K
68.1K
+ 1
2.1K
PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
  • 505
    Easy to use
  • 326
    Gmail integration
  • 312
    Enough free space
  • 268
    Collaboration
  • 249
    Stable service
  • 128
    Desktop and mobile apps
  • 97
    Offline sync
  • 79
    Apps
  • 74
    15 gb storage
  • 50
    Add-ons
  • 9
    Integrates well
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Simple back-up tool
  • 2
    Amazing
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 2
    Fast upload speeds
  • 2
    The more the merrier
  • 2
    So easy
  • 2
    Wonderful
  • 2
    Linux terminal transfer tools
  • 2
    It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
  • 1
    UI
  • 1
    Windows desktop
  • 1
    G Suite integration
CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
  • 7
    Organization via web ui sucks
  • 2
    Not a real database

related Google Drive posts

Tom Klein

Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

See more
Shared insights
on
Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

See more
CloudFlare logo

CloudFlare

76.6K
22.5K
1.8K
The Web Performance & Security Company.
76.6K
22.5K
+ 1
1.8K
PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 424
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 277
    Free ssl
  • 199
    Easy setup
  • 190
    Security
  • 180
    Ssl
  • 98
    Great cdn
  • 77
    Optimizer
  • 71
    Simple
  • 44
    Great UI
  • 28
    Great js cdn
  • 12
    Apps
  • 12
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 12
    DNS Analytics
  • 12
    AutoMinify
  • 9
    Rocket Loader
  • 9
    Ipv6
  • 9
    Easy
  • 8
    IPv6 "One Click"
  • 8
    Fantastic CDN service
  • 7
    DNSSEC
  • 7
    Nice DNS
  • 7
    SSHFP
  • 7
    Free GeoIP
  • 7
    Amazing performance
  • 7
    API
  • 7
    Cheapest SSL
  • 6
    SPDY
  • 6
    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
  • 5
    Ubuntu
  • 5
    Asynchronous resource loading
  • 4
    Global Load Balancing
  • 4
    Performance
  • 4
    Easy Use
  • 3
    CDN
  • 2
    Registrar
  • 2
    Support for SSHFP records
  • 1
    Web3
  • 1
    Прохси
  • 1
    HTTPS3/Quic
CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 2
    No support for SSHFP records
  • 2
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

related CloudFlare posts

Tom Klein

Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

See more
Johnny Bell

When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

See more
Dropbox logo

Dropbox

23.3K
18.2K
1.7K
Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
23.3K
18.2K
+ 1
1.7K
PROS OF DROPBOX
  • 434
    Easy to work with
  • 256
    Free
  • 216
    Popular
  • 176
    Shared file hosting
  • 167
    'just works'
  • 100
    No brainer
  • 79
    Integration with external services
  • 76
    Simple
  • 49
    Good api
  • 38
    Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
  • 11
    It just works
  • 8
    Convenient
  • 7
    Accessible from all of my devices
  • 5
    Command Line client
  • 4
    Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
  • 4
    Can even be used by your grandma
  • 3
    Reliable
  • 3
    Sync API
  • 3
    Mac app
  • 3
    Cross platform app
  • 2
    Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
  • 2
    Delta synchronization
  • 2
    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
  • 2
    Backups, local and cloud
  • 2
    Extended version history
  • 2
    Beautiful UI
  • 1
    YC Company
  • 1
    What a beautiful app
  • 1
    Easy/no setup
  • 1
    So easy
  • 1
    The more the merrier
  • 1
    Easy to work with
  • 1
    For when client needs file without opening firewall
  • 1
    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Official Linux app
  • 0
    The more the merrier
CONS OF DROPBOX
  • 3
    Personal vs company account is confusing
  • 1
    Replication kills CPU and battery

related Dropbox posts

Shared insights
on
Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

See more
Shared insights
on
BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

See more
Amazon CloudFront logo

Amazon CloudFront

21.3K
10.7K
935
Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
21.3K
10.7K
+ 1
935
PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
  • 245
    Fast
  • 166
    Cdn
  • 157
    Compatible with other aws services
  • 125
    Simple
  • 108
    Global
  • 41
    Cheap
  • 36
    Cost-effective
  • 27
    Reliable
  • 19
    One stop solution
  • 9
    Elastic
  • 1
    Object store
  • 1
    HTTP/2 Support
CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
  • 3
    UI could use some work
  • 1
    Invalidations take so long

related Amazon CloudFront posts

Russel Werner
Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

#StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

See more
Julien DeFrance
Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

Future improvements / technology decisions included:

Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

See more
Akamai logo

Akamai

1.9K
439
0
The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
1.9K
439
+ 1
0
PROS OF AKAMAI
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Akamai posts

      MaxCDN logo

      MaxCDN

      1.6K
      553
      100
      Our CDN makes your site load faster!
      1.6K
      553
      + 1
      100
      PROS OF MAXCDN
      • 47
        Easy setup
      • 33
        Speed to my clients
      • 15
        Great service & Customer Support
      • 5
        Shared and Affordable SSL
      CONS OF MAXCDN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related MaxCDN posts

        Justin Dorfman
        Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 243.9K views

        When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

        What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

        For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

        • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
        • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
        • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

        Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

        See more
        Todd Gardner

        We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

        The reports and controls were also considerably better.

        See more
        Incapsula logo

        Incapsula

        1.3K
        72
        5
        Cloud-based service that makes websites safer, faster and more reliable.
        1.3K
        72
        + 1
        5
        PROS OF INCAPSULA
        • 5
          Best of them
        CONS OF INCAPSULA
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Incapsula posts