StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CakePHP vs Symfony

CakePHP vs Symfony

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CakePHP
CakePHP
Stacks672
Followers401
Votes137
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks3.4K
Symfony
Symfony
Stacks8.5K
Followers6.2K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars30.7K
Forks9.7K

CakePHP vs Symfony: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CakePHP and Symfony

CakePHP and Symfony are both popular PHP frameworks used for web application development. While they share similarities in terms of their MVC architecture and object-oriented programming approach, there are several key differences that distinguish them from each other.

1. Ease of Use: CakePHP is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It follows the convention over configuration principle, meaning that developers can get started quickly without having to spend much time on configuration. On the other hand, Symfony provides a more flexible and modular approach, allowing developers to have more control over the configuration and customization of their applications.

2. Community and Documentation: Symfony has a larger and more active community compared to CakePHP. This means that there is a wider range of resources, tutorials, and plugins available for Symfony developers. Additionally, Symfony has extensive and well-documented official documentation, making it easier for developers to learn and troubleshoot issues. CakePHP, while having a smaller community, still has a dedicated user base and offers decent documentation.

3. Flexibility and Scalability: Symfony is known for its flexibility and scalability, making it an ideal choice for large, complex projects. It includes a wide range of reusable components that can be easily integrated and customized. CakePHP, although less flexible than Symfony, provides a more opinionated approach, which can be beneficial for smaller projects with less complex requirements.

4. Performance: Symfony has a reputation for better performance compared to CakePHP. The Symfony framework incorporates various optimizations, such as caching and opcode caching, to improve the overall speed and performance of web applications. While CakePHP also performs well, Symfony's emphasis on performance sets it apart, particularly for high-traffic or resource-intensive applications.

5. Database Abstraction: Symphony provides a powerful and extensible database abstraction layer called Doctrine. This allows developers to work with different databases seamlessly and provides advanced features like query caching and support for database migrations. In contrast, CakePHP uses its own ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) called CakePHP ORM, which is simpler compared to Doctrine and may be a better fit for developers looking for a more straightforward approach to database interactions.

6. Learning Curve and Code Reusability: Symfony has a steeper learning curve compared to CakePHP. Its extensive feature set and flexibility require developers to invest more time in learning the framework's concepts and best practices. However, the upside is that Symfony's modular architecture allows for a high level of code reusability, enabling developers to leverage existing components and libraries easily. CakePHP, on the other hand, has a gentler learning curve and promotes rapid development with its conventions.

In summary, CakePHP offers simplicity and ease of use, suitable for smaller projects, while Symfony provides flexibility, scalability, and performance optimizations, making it more suitable for larger and complex applications with a steeper learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CakePHP, Symfony

Danilo
Danilo

Senior Software Engineer at WeRoad

Dec 14, 2021

Decided

For a full-stack app or just simple APIs I'd go 100% with Laravel. You get a clean architecture, beautiful documentation and friendly and always growing community: the project is yours, from A to Z. With their docs and resources like Laracast you can start from zero and build what you want, when you want. The learning curve is definitely smaller when compared to Symfony and, with the help of a bit of "magic" (Facades etc.) you get the same results in the half of the time with cleaner code.

105k views105k
Comments
Michael
Michael

Developer at Fleet-Nomics

Sep 11, 2022

Needs adviceonBubbleBubbleCodeIgniterCodeIgniterCakePHPCakePHP

Hi all, I need to create a simple IoT interface application that connects the end device API with a GeoTab API. I am considering using Bubble due to its simple interface and configuration tools, but I fear it's too simple. We will want to add features and new devices as we grow - I was thinking of using CodeIgniter or CakePHP on a hosted site for the application. Must support JCOM encoding between the two APIs and there is no need for a separate interface as GeoTab already has one; we are just connecting and pushing data. Thoughts?

47.4k views47.4k
Comments
Juan Jose
Juan Jose

May 8, 2021

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

Hi, Which tool will you recommend:

I need to build a web application, oriented to small businesses, like a small ERP. It will have intensive use of Sql to access a PostgreSQL database. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory.

If you think another tool will be better, please let that know.

Thanks a lot

69.6k views69.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP
CakePHP
Symfony
Symfony

It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Stars
30.7K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
9.7K
Stacks
672
Stacks
8.5K
Followers
401
Followers
6.2K
Votes
137
Votes
1.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Open source
  • 25
    Really rapid framework
  • 19
    Good code organization
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 10
    Security best practices
Cons
  • 1
    Follows Good Programming Practices
  • 1
    Robust Baking Tool
Pros
  • 177
    Open source
  • 149
    Php
  • 130
    Community
  • 129
    Dependency injection
  • 122
    Professional
Cons
  • 10
    Too many dependency
  • 8
    Lot of config files
  • 4
    YMAL
  • 3
    Feature creep
  • 1
    Bloated
Integrations
PHP
PHP
PHP
PHP
ReactPHP
ReactPHP

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, Symfony?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase