StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. Chainer vs TensorFlow

Chainer vs TensorFlow

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TensorFlow
TensorFlow
Stacks3.9K
Followers3.5K
Votes106
GitHub Stars192.3K
Forks74.9K
Chainer
Chainer
Stacks17
Followers23
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks1.4K

Chainer vs TensorFlow: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Chainer and TensorFlow are both popular deep learning frameworks that are widely used in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning. 

1. **Computational Graph Construction**: One key difference between Chainer and TensorFlow is how they handle computational graph construction. Chainer uses a define-by-run approach, where the computational graph is dynamically constructed as the operations are executed. In contrast, TensorFlow uses a define-and-run approach, where the computational graph is defined before execution, offering better optimization opportunities.

2. **Static vs Dynamic Graphs**: TensorFlow relies on static computational graph construction, meaning the graph structure is fixed before the actual computation. This approach allows for better optimizations but can be restrictive in certain cases. Chainer, on the other hand, uses dynamic computational graphs that can adapt and change during runtime, providing more flexibility and ease in debugging models.

3. **Eager Execution**: Chainer supports eager execution by default, allowing users to execute operations immediately without needing to define a computational graph. This makes it easy for users to interactively experiment with their code and prototypes. TensorFlow, although it has introduced eager execution mode, traditionally requires explicit graph construction before execution.

4. **Ease of Use**: Chainer is known for its ease of use and simplicity, making it a preferred choice for beginners or researchers who are new to deep learning. TensorFlow, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive features, which cater more towards production-level applications and larger-scale projects.

5. **Community Support and Ecosystem**: TensorFlow boasts a larger and more established community with a wide range of resources, tutorials, and pre-trained models available. This robust ecosystem contributes to the popularity and widespread adoption of TensorFlow. Chainer, while having a smaller user base, still provides strong documentation and support for its users.

In Summary, Chainer and TensorFlow differ in their computational graph construction approaches, graph flexibility, eager execution support, ease of use, and community support, catering to different user preferences in the deep learning domain.```

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TensorFlow, Chainer

Adithya
Adithya

Student at PES UNIVERSITY

May 11, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning some basic machine learning concepts. So which of the following frameworks is better to use: Keras / TensorFlow/PyTorch. I have prior knowledge in python(and even pandas), java, js and C. It would be nice if something could point out the advantages of one over the other especially in terms of resources, documentation and flexibility. Also, could someone tell me where to find the right resources or tutorials for the above frameworks? Thanks in advance, hope you are doing well!!

107k views107k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TensorFlow
TensorFlow
Chainer
Chainer

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

It is an open source deep learning framework written purely in Python on top of Numpy and CuPy Python libraries aiming at flexibility. It supports CUDA computation. It only requires a few lines of code to leverage a GPU. It also runs on multiple GPUs with little effort.

-
Supports CUDA computation;Runs on multiple GPUs ;Supports various network architectures ;Supports per-batch architectures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
192.3K
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Forks
74.9K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
3.9K
Stacks
17
Followers
3.5K
Followers
23
Votes
106
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 32
    High Performance
  • 19
    Connect Research and Production
  • 16
    Deep Flexibility
  • 12
    Auto-Differentiation
  • 11
    True Portability
Cons
  • 9
    Hard
  • 6
    Hard to debug
  • 2
    Documentation not very helpful
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
NumPy
NumPy
CUDA
CUDA

What are some alternatives to TensorFlow, Chainer?

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

PredictionIO

PredictionIO

PredictionIO is an open source machine learning server for software developers to create predictive features, such as personalization, recommendation and content discovery.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope