Cisco ASA vs Wazuh

Overview

Wazuh

Stacks143

Followers336

Votes4

GitHub Stars13.8K

Forks2.0K

Cisco ASA

Stacks22

Followers28

Votes0

Cisco ASA vs Wazuh: What are the differences?

### Key Differences between Cisco ASA and Wazuh

1. **Functionality**: Cisco ASA is a firewall appliance that primarily focuses on providing network security features such as VPN, intrusion prevention, and web security, while Wazuh is an open-source security monitoring platform focused on log analysis, intrusion detection, and security incident response.

2. **Deployment**: Cisco ASA is a hardware appliance that requires physical installation within a network infrastructure, while Wazuh can be deployed either as a software agent on individual systems or as a centralized server for monitoring an entire network environment.

3. **Scalability**: Cisco ASA is designed for larger enterprise networks with high traffic loads, offering features like clustering for scalability, while Wazuh is more suitable for smaller to mid-sized organizations due to its ease of deployment and management without the need for complex setups.

4. **Alerts and Notifications**: Cisco ASA provides alerts based on network traffic and security events detected by the firewall, while Wazuh focuses on collecting and analyzing log data from various sources to generate alerts on potential security incidents like malware infections or system compromises.

5. **Cost**: Cisco ASA typically involves high upfront costs for hardware procurement and licensing fees, in addition to ongoing maintenance costs, while Wazuh is free to use as an open-source solution, with optional paid support plans available for enterprise users.

6. **Customization**: Cisco ASA offers more customization options for network security policies, access control rules, and VPN configurations, tailored to specific network requirements, while Wazuh provides customizable rules for log analysis and detection capabilities, allowing users to define their own security criteria.

In Summary, Cisco ASA and Wazuh differ in terms of functionality, deployment, scalability, alerts and notifications, cost, and customization options for network security and monitoring.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wazuh	Cisco ASA
It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.	It is a security device that combines firewall, antivirus, intrusion prevention, and virtual private network (VPN) capabilities. It provides proactive threat defense that stops attacks before they spread through the network.
Security Analytics; Intrusion Detection; Log Data Analysis; File Integrity Monitoring; Vulnerability Detection; Configuration Assessment; Incident Response; Regulatory Compliance	Superior multilayered protection; Simplified management and lower costs; Unified security services and task automation; Wide range of sizes and form factors
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 143	Stacks 22
Followers 336	Followers 28
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Open-source 2 Well documented	No community feedback yet
Integrations
CloudFlare WordPress Linux macOS Windows Splunk	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Wazuh, Cisco ASA?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Authy

We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Related Comparisons

Cisco ASA vs Wazuh: What are the differences?

### Key Differences between Cisco ASA and Wazuh

1. **Functionality**: Cisco ASA is a firewall appliance that primarily focuses on providing network security features such as VPN, intrusion prevention, and web security, while Wazuh is an open-source security monitoring platform focused on log analysis, intrusion detection, and security incident response.

2. **Deployment**: Cisco ASA is a hardware appliance that requires physical installation within a network infrastructure, while Wazuh can be deployed either as a software agent on individual systems or as a centralized server for monitoring an entire network environment.

3. **Scalability**: Cisco ASA is designed for larger enterprise networks with high traffic loads, offering features like clustering for scalability, while Wazuh is more suitable for smaller to mid-sized organizations due to its ease of deployment and management without the need for complex setups.

4. **Alerts and Notifications**: Cisco ASA provides alerts based on network traffic and security events detected by the firewall, while Wazuh focuses on collecting and analyzing log data from various sources to generate alerts on potential security incidents like malware infections or system compromises.

5. **Cost**: Cisco ASA typically involves high upfront costs for hardware procurement and licensing fees, in addition to ongoing maintenance costs, while Wazuh is free to use as an open-source solution, with optional paid support plans available for enterprise users.

6. **Customization**: Cisco ASA offers more customization options for network security policies, access control rules, and VPN configurations, tailored to specific network requirements, while Wazuh provides customizable rules for log analysis and detection capabilities, allowing users to define their own security criteria.

In Summary, Cisco ASA and Wazuh differ in terms of functionality, deployment, scalability, alerts and notifications, cost, and customization options for network security and monitoring.

Cisco ASA vs Wazuh

Overview