StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Closure Library vs React

Closure Library vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Closure Library
Closure Library
Stacks28
Followers50
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.9K
Forks1.1K

Closure Library vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction:
When it comes to front-end development, developers often have to choose between different libraries or frameworks. Two popular options are Closure Library and React. Understanding the key differences between these two can help in making an informed decision for a project.

  1. Performance: Closure Library is known for its lightweight nature and optimized performance, making it a suitable choice for projects where speed and efficiency are critical factors. On the other hand, React is a more feature-rich framework that comes with additional functionalities, which can sometimes impact performance, especially in larger applications.

  2. Component Architecture: React's core concept is based on components, where the UI is divided into independent reusable pieces. This makes it easier to manage and scale complex applications. Closure Library, on the other hand, follows a more modular approach, which can sometimes lead to a steeper learning curve, but offers more flexibility in structuring the codebase.

  3. State Management: React provides a built-in state management system that allows components to manage their internal state and communicate with each other effectively. In contrast, Closure Library relies on external libraries or custom solutions for managing state, which can sometimes result in a more fragmented approach to data handling.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: React has a larger and more active community with a vast ecosystem of third-party libraries, tools, and resources. This can be advantageous in terms of finding support, learning resources, and expanding functionalities. Closure Library, while backed by Google, has a smaller community and a more limited ecosystem, which might affect the availability of resources and updates.

  5. Rendering Techniques: React utilizes a virtual DOM (Document Object Model) and a diffing algorithm to efficiently update the actual DOM, minimizing unnecessary re-renders and improving performance. Closure Library, on the other hand, relies on direct DOM manipulation, which can sometimes lead to suboptimal rendering performance in complex applications.

  6. Tooling and DevTools: React comes with a set of powerful developer tools such as React DevTools, Redux, and third-party extensions that aid in debugging, profiling, and inspecting components. Closure Library, while offering some debugging tools, may not have the same level of comprehensive developer tooling support as React, which can impact the development and debugging experience.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Closure Library and React, such as performance, component architecture, state management, community support, rendering techniques, and tooling, can help developers make an informed choice based on their project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Closure Library

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Closure Library
Closure Library

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Closure Library is a powerful, low-level JavaScript library designed for building complex and scalable web applications. It is used by many Google web applications, such as Google Search, Gmail, Google Docs, Google+, Google Maps, and others.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
cross-browser functions for DOM manipulations and events, Ajax and JSON; high-level objects such as User Interface widgets and Controls
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
4.9K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
28
Followers
147.0K
Followers
50
Votes
4.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Closure Compiler
Closure Compiler

What are some alternatives to React, Closure Library?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase