ClustrixDB vs Microsoft SQL Server

Overview

Microsoft SQL Server

Stacks21.3K

Followers15.5K

Votes540

ClustrixDB

Stacks4

Followers35

Votes3

ClustrixDB vs Microsoft SQL Server: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between ClustrixDB and Microsoft SQL Server.

1. **Scalability**: ClustrixDB is specifically designed to scale out horizontally by adding nodes to increase performance and capacity. In contrast, Microsoft SQL Server relies on vertical scaling by upgrading hardware resources on a single server.
   
2. **Architecture**: ClustrixDB uses a distributed shared-nothing architecture where data is distributed across all nodes, allowing for high availability and fault tolerance. On the other hand, Microsoft SQL Server utilizes a centralized architecture with a single point of failure.
   
3. **Data Distribution**: ClustrixDB automatically distributes data evenly across nodes for balanced workload distribution, leading to improved performance. In contrast, Microsoft SQL Server requires manual partitioning and sharding to distribute data effectively.
   
4. **ACID Compliance**: Both ClustrixDB and Microsoft SQL Server are ACID compliant, ensuring data consistency and reliability. However, ClustrixDB achieves this on a distributed scale while Microsoft SQL Server does it on a single-node level.
   
5. **High Availability**: ClustrixDB offers built-in high availability features such as automatic failover and self-healing capabilities to ensure continuous uptime. Microsoft SQL Server requires additional configuration and external tools to achieve similar high availability.
   
6. **Cost and Licensing**: ClustrixDB is a subscription-based service with pricing dependent on the number of nodes, while Microsoft SQL Server follows a traditional licensing model with upfront costs and additional fees for features like high availability.

In Summary, ClustrixDB and Microsoft SQL Server differ in scalability, architecture, data distribution, ACID compliance, high availability, and cost/licensing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Microsoft SQL Server, ClustrixDB

Erin

IT Specialist

Mar 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

Microsoft SQL Server

MySQL

PostgreSQL

I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:

I need to use either @{MySQL}|tool:1025| or @{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| on a @{Linux}|tool:10483| based OS. Which would be better for this application?
I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.

668k views668k

Comments

Josip

Senior frontend developer

Aug 31, 2021

Decided

Needed to transform intranet desktop application to the web-based one, as mid-term project. My choice was to use Django/Angular stack - Django since it, in conjunction with Python, enabled rapid development, an Angular since it was stable and enterprise-level framework. Deadlines were somewhat tight since the project to migrate was being developed for several years and had a lot of domain knowledge integrated into it. Definitely was good decision, since deadlines was manageable, juniors were able to enter the project very quickly and we were able to continuously deploy very well.

73.6k views73.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SQL Server	ClustrixDB
Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.	ClustrixDB is a scale-out SQL database built from the ground up with a distributed shared nothing architecture, automatic data redistribution (so you never need to shard), with built in fault tolerance, all accessible by a simple SQL interface and support for business critical MySQL features – replication, triggers, stored routines, etc.
-	Is built from the ground up with a shared-nothing architecture. There is no MySQL code in ClustrixDB;Is built to scale transactions while maintaning ACID;Scales to add capacity by simply adding commodity servers to the cluster;Is fault tolerant and automatically recovers in the face of hardware or other failure;Uses a simple SQL interface that is compatible with MySQL syntax
Statistics
Stacks 21.3K	Stacks 4
Followers 15.5K	Followers 35
Votes 540	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 139 Reliable and easy to use 101 High performance 95 Great with .net 65 Works well with .net 56 Easy to maintain Cons 4 Expensive Licensing 2 Microsoft 1 The maximum number of connections is only 14000 connect 1 Replication can loose the data 1 Allwayon can loose data in asycronious mode	Pros 1 ClustrixDB is a scale-out RDBMS and drop-in replacement 1 Relational Scale-Out database 1 Very High Connection Count

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SQL Server, ClustrixDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

ClustrixDB vs Microsoft SQL Server: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between ClustrixDB and Microsoft SQL Server.

1. **Scalability**: ClustrixDB is specifically designed to scale out horizontally by adding nodes to increase performance and capacity. In contrast, Microsoft SQL Server relies on vertical scaling by upgrading hardware resources on a single server.
   
2. **Architecture**: ClustrixDB uses a distributed shared-nothing architecture where data is distributed across all nodes, allowing for high availability and fault tolerance. On the other hand, Microsoft SQL Server utilizes a centralized architecture with a single point of failure.
   
3. **Data Distribution**: ClustrixDB automatically distributes data evenly across nodes for balanced workload distribution, leading to improved performance. In contrast, Microsoft SQL Server requires manual partitioning and sharding to distribute data effectively.
   
4. **ACID Compliance**: Both ClustrixDB and Microsoft SQL Server are ACID compliant, ensuring data consistency and reliability. However, ClustrixDB achieves this on a distributed scale while Microsoft SQL Server does it on a single-node level.
   
5. **High Availability**: ClustrixDB offers built-in high availability features such as automatic failover and self-healing capabilities to ensure continuous uptime. Microsoft SQL Server requires additional configuration and external tools to achieve similar high availability.
   
6. **Cost and Licensing**: ClustrixDB is a subscription-based service with pricing dependent on the number of nodes, while Microsoft SQL Server follows a traditional licensing model with upfront costs and additional fees for features like high availability.

In Summary, ClustrixDB and Microsoft SQL Server differ in scalability, architecture, data distribution, ACID compliance, high availability, and cost/licensing models.

ClustrixDB vs Microsoft SQL Server

Overview