StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET Core vs Cocoa (OS X)

.NET Core vs Cocoa (OS X)

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cocoa (OS X)
Cocoa (OS X)
Stacks39
Followers52
Votes6
.NET Core
.NET Core
Stacks7.0K
Followers2.6K
Votes155
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K

.NET Core vs Cocoa (OS X): What are the differences?

Introduction

The comparison between .NET Core and Cocoa (OS X) will highlight the key differences between these two software development platforms.

  1. Language Compatibility: .NET Core supports multiple programming languages like C#, F#, and Visual Basic, while Cocoa primarily uses Objective-C or Swift for development. This difference gives developers more flexibility in choosing a language suitable for their project requirements.

  2. Platform Compatibility: .NET Core is a cross-platform framework that can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing a wider reach for developers to create applications. In contrast, Cocoa is primarily designed for macOS and iOS development, limiting its compatibility to Apple's operating systems.

  3. Ecosystem and Libraries: .NET Core has a vast ecosystem with a rich set of libraries and frameworks available in the NuGet package manager, offering extensive functionalities for developers. On the other hand, Cocoa has a robust set of Apple frameworks like Cocoa Touch and Cocoa that are specifically designed for macOS and iOS development.

  4. Community Support: .NET Core has a large and active community of developers contributing to its growth and providing support through forums, documentation, and open-source projects. In comparison, the Cocoa community is more concentrated around Apple's developer ecosystem, which may limit the availability of resources for troubleshooting and development assistance.

  5. Tooling and IDE: .NET Core can be developed using various IDEs like Visual Studio, Visual Studio Code, and JetBrains Rider, providing developers with a range of options for their development environment. In contrast, Cocoa development is primarily done using Xcode, Apple's official IDE, which offers a comprehensive set of tools and resources tailored for macOS and iOS development.

  6. Deployment Options: .NET Core applications can be deployed as standalone executables or hosted on various platforms like Azure, Docker, and IIS, offering flexibility in deployment strategies. On the other hand, Cocoa applications are primarily distributed through the Mac App Store or enterprise distribution methods specified by Apple, limiting the deployment options for developers.

In Summary, .NET Core and Cocoa differ in language compatibility, platform compatibility, ecosystem and libraries, community support, tooling and IDE, and deployment options, providing distinct choices for developers based on their project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Cocoa (OS X), .NET Core

Anonymous
Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k
Comments
Jakub
Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cocoa (OS X)
Cocoa (OS X)
.NET Core
.NET Core

Much of Cocoa is implemented in Objective-C, an object-oriented language that is compiled to run at incredible speed, yet employs a truly dynamic runtime making it uniquely flexible. Because Objective-C is a superset of C, it is easy to mix C and even C++ into your Cocoa applications.

Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.

-
Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
Stacks
39
Stacks
7.0K
Followers
52
Followers
2.6K
Votes
6
Votes
155
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Great community
  • 2
    IOS
  • 1
    Backed by apple
Pros
  • 30
    Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff
  • 27
    Fast
  • 26
    Cross-platform
  • 25
    Great performance
  • 18
    All Platform (Mac, Linux, Windows)
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
Linux
Linux
C#
C#
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
.NET
.NET
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Vim
Vim
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
F#
F#

What are some alternatives to Cocoa (OS X), .NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase