StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Codeception vs Robot Framework

Codeception vs Robot Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codeception
Codeception
Stacks155
Followers111
Votes5
Robot Framework
Robot Framework
Stacks344
Followers525
Votes120

Codeception vs Robot Framework: What are the differences?

Markdown code

<Write Introduction here>
1. <Bold subheading 1>: <Description 1>
2. <Bold subheading 2>: <Description 2>
.....
n. <<Bold subheading n>: <Description n>

In Summary, <Write summary here>

Introduction

The following Markdown code provides a comparison of the key differences between Codeception and Robot Framework.

  1. Syntax: Codeception uses a simple and easy-to-understand syntax that is similar to natural language, making it beginner-friendly. Robot Framework, on the other hand, uses a keyword-driven syntax that is more structured and allows for better organization and reusability of test cases.

  2. Support for Languages: Codeception primarily supports PHP for writing tests, while Robot Framework supports multiple languages such as Python, Java, and .NET. This makes Robot Framework more versatile for teams that work with different programming languages.

  3. Browser Automation: Codeception provides built-in support for browser automation, allowing users to easily simulate user interactions such as clicking buttons and filling out forms. Robot Framework, on the other hand, requires additional libraries for browser automation, making it less convenient for testing web applications.

  4. Built-in Test Doubles: Codeception comes with built-in support for test doubles like mocks and stubs, allowing users to easily isolate dependencies and simulate different scenarios. Robot Framework does not have native support for test doubles, requiring users to rely on external libraries or custom solutions.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Codeception has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available for different testing needs. Robot Framework also has a strong community and ecosystem, but it may have fewer resources and plugins compared to Codeception for some specific use cases.

  6. Integration and Framework Support: Codeception can be easily integrated with other PHP frameworks like Laravel and Symfony, making it a popular choice for PHP developers. Robot Framework, on the other hand, has good integration with Selenium and Appium for web and mobile testing respectively, making it suitable for both web and mobile application testing.

In Summary, Codeception and Robot Framework differ in their syntax, language support, browser automation capabilities, built-in test double support, community and ecosystem, and integration with different frameworks and tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codeception
Codeception
Robot Framework
Robot Framework

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Statistics
Stacks
155
Stacks
344
Followers
111
Followers
525
Votes
5
Votes
120
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get up and running some simple tests
Pros
  • 23
    Easy with CI/CD
  • 22
    Open Source
  • 21
    Simple Usage
  • 14
    Easily extendable
  • 13
    Vast Scope more than Front End
Cons
  • 8
    Nested Loops
  • 1
    Mostly for python
  • 1
    Devtooling is not there
  • 0
    Extensive library support
  • 0
    Mobile supports

What are some alternatives to Codeception, Robot Framework?

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

react-testing-library

react-testing-library

It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana