StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. CoffeeScript vs JavaScript

CoffeeScript vs JavaScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CoffeeScript
CoffeeScript
Stacks3.7K
Followers1.2K
Votes1.0K
GitHub Stars16.6K
Forks2.0K
JavaScript
JavaScript
Stacks392.2K
Followers284.0K
Votes8.1K

CoffeeScript vs JavaScript: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CoffeeScript and JavaScript

CoffeeScript and JavaScript are two popular programming languages used for web development. While both languages share similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. Below are the six key differences between CoffeeScript and JavaScript.

  1. Syntax: One of the major differences between CoffeeScript and JavaScript is their syntax. CoffeeScript uses a more concise syntax inspired by Ruby and Python, with significant whitespace and optional parentheses. On the other hand, JavaScript follows a more traditional C-style syntax with explicit semicolons and curly braces. This distinction in syntax affects the readability and writability of the code.

  2. Implicit Variables and Scoping: CoffeeScript automatically declares variables using the var keyword, making them local to the current scope by default. JavaScript, however, requires explicit declaration of variables using var, let, or const keywords, offering more control over the scope of variables. This difference affects how the code behaves and can impact the management of variables within a program.

  3. Function Definition: In CoffeeScript, function definitions are more streamlined and resemble Ruby-like syntax. The function keyword is replaced with ->, making function definitions shorter and simpler. In JavaScript, the function keyword is used explicitly. This difference affects how functions are defined and can affect the code's clarity and brevity.

  4. Automatic Semicolon Insertion: CoffeeScript adheres to significant whitespace and automatically inserts semicolons where necessary. This feature can help reduce syntax errors caused by missing semicolons. However, JavaScript requires explicit semicolon usage to denote the end of statements. While JavaScript's approach may seem more error-prone, it offers greater clarity and ensures consistent behavior across different environments.

  5. Better Error Handling: CoffeeScript provides better error handling compared to JavaScript. It provides clearer error messages with line numbers, which makes debugging easier. JavaScript, on the other hand, can sometimes provide vague error messages that require more scrutiny to identify and fix issues.

  6. Compiling and Interoperability: Another key difference lies in how CoffeeScript is compiled into JavaScript. CoffeeScript requires a compilation step to convert its code into JavaScript. This step can be automated using build tools or performed manually. JavaScript, being the native language of web browsers, does not require compilation and can be executed directly. This difference in compilation can affect the development workflow and the ease of integrating CoffeeScript code with existing JavaScript projects.

In summary, CoffeeScript and JavaScript differ in syntax, variable scoping, function definition, semicolon usage, error handling, and the need for compilation. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the most suitable language for their projects, considering factors like readability, writability, and interoperability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CoffeeScript, JavaScript

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Nathan
Nathan

Fullstack Developer at Alpsify

Sep 23, 2020

Needs advice

Am I the only one to think that libraries like Bootstrap, Vuetify, Materialize, Foundation are too much sometimes ?

Most of the time you are loading all the library and using 10% of it. And on that 10% you are modifying 90% of it.

I feel like using grid and pure CSS / JS are enough and cleaner.

101k views101k
Comments
Muhamed
Muhamed

Apr 28, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptDjangoDjango

I am currently learning web development with Python and JavaScript course by CS50 Harvard university. It covers python, Flask, Django, SQL, Travis CI, javascript,HTML ,CSS and more. I am very interested in Flutter app development. Can I know what is the difference between learning these above-mentioned frameworks vs learning flutter directly? I am planning to learn flutter so that I can do both web development and app development. Are there any perks of learning these frameworks before flutter?

737k views737k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CoffeeScript
CoffeeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript

It adds syntactic sugar inspired by Ruby, Python and Haskell in an effort to enhance JavaScript's brevity and readability. Specific additional features include list comprehension and de-structuring assignment.

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

String Interpolation; Statement Modifiers; Callback Handling; Comprehensions; The Fat Arrow; Scoping; Clean JavaScript Output.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.7K
Stacks
392.2K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
284.0K
Votes
1.0K
Votes
8.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 199
    Easy to read
  • 179
    Faster to write
  • 126
    Syntactic sugar
  • 104
    Readable
  • 104
    Elegant
Cons
  • 3
    No ES6
  • 1
    Unclear what will be grouped to {…}
  • 1
    Parentheses required in 0-ary function calls
  • 1
    Corner cases in syntax
Pros
  • 1670
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1497
    It's everywhere
  • 1163
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 899
    Fast
  • 746
    Light weight
Cons
  • 24
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 16
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 9
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 8
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error

What are some alternatives to CoffeeScript, JavaScript?

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase