StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Colossus vs Nameko

Colossus vs Nameko

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Colossus
Colossus
Stacks7
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks97
Nameko
Nameko
Stacks20
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks468

Colossus vs Nameko: What are the differences?

Developers describe Colossus as "I/O and Microservice library for Scala". Colossus is a lightweight framework for building high-performance applications in Scala that require non-blocking network I/O. In particular Colossus is focused on low-latency stateless microservices where often the service is little more than an abstraction over a database and/or cache. For this use case, Colossus aims to maximize performance while keeping the interface clean and concise. On the other hand, Nameko is detailed as "Python microservices framework". Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

Colossus and Nameko belong to "Microframeworks (Backend)" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Colossus are:

  • Clean Event-based Programming
  • Seamless Integration with Akka
  • Real-time Metrics

On the other hand, Nameko provides the following key features:

  • Focus on business logic
  • Distributed and scalable
  • Extensible

Colossus and Nameko are both open source tools. Nameko with 2.98K GitHub stars and 290 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Colossus with 1.14K GitHub stars and 100 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Colossus, Nameko

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Colossus
Colossus
Nameko
Nameko

Colossus is a lightweight framework for building high-performance applications in Scala that require non-blocking network I/O. In particular Colossus is focused on low-latency stateless microservices where often the service is little more than an abstraction over a database and/or cache. For this use case, Colossus aims to maximize performance while keeping the interface clean and concise.

Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

Clean Event-based Programming;Seamless Integration with Akka;Real-time Metrics;Write More than Just Services
Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Forks
97
GitHub Forks
468
Stacks
7
Stacks
20
Followers
12
Followers
79
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Scala
Scala
Django
Django
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Sentry
Sentry
SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy

What are some alternatives to Colossus, Nameko?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot