StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CUBA Platform vs Next.js

CUBA Platform vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform
Stacks10
Followers23
Votes3
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks216

CUBA Platform vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: CUBA Platform and Next.js are both frameworks used for developing web applications. However, they differ in various aspects that cater to different needs and preferences.

  1. Architecture: The CUBA Platform follows a Java-based architecture that utilizes the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for its execution, while Next.js is built on top of JavaScript and React, allowing for a more flexible and lightweight approach.

  2. Integration: CUBA Platform provides an all-in-one development environment with pre-built tools and components for rapid application development, while Next.js offers closer integration with the React ecosystem and a more modular approach to building applications.

  3. Data Management: CUBA Platform offers a robust data management system with built-in support for CRUD operations, database modeling tools, and REST API generation, whereas Next.js relies on external libraries and APIs for data management tasks.

  4. User Interface: CUBA Platform provides a rich set of UI components and layout management tools out of the box, making it easier to create complex user interfaces, while Next.js allows for more customization and control over the UI through React components and CSS styling.

  5. Community and Support: Next.js benefits from being a part of the larger JavaScript and React community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins, while CUBA Platform has a more niche community that focuses on enterprise application development and support.

  6. Scalability: CUBA Platform is designed for building large-scale enterprise applications with complex business logic and data requirements, offering features like multi-tenancy and role-based access control, whereas Next.js is more suitable for smaller to medium-sized projects that prioritize speed and simplicity over advanced functionalities.

In Summary, CUBA Platform and Next.js differ in their architecture, integration, data management, user interface capabilities, community support, and scalability options to meet the diverse needs of web developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, CUBA Platform

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Generic user interface; Multiple data stores; User management; Data access control; Full audit of user actions; Dynamic attributes; File storage; Admin tools; Scheduled tasks; Generic REST API; Single sign-on
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
216
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
10
Followers
5.1K
Followers
23
Votes
330
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 1
    Component based
  • 1
    Lots out of the box
  • 1
    Java
Integrations
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Next.js, CUBA Platform?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase