StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs Mockito

Cucumber vs Mockito

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mockito
Mockito
Stacks3.6K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.6K
Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36

Cucumber vs Mockito: What are the differences?

Cucumber and Mockito are two popular testing frameworks in the software development industry. Both frameworks are used for different purposes and have distinct features that set them apart from each other.
  1. Behavior-Driven Development: Cucumber is primarily designed for Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) testing. It allows the creation of test scenarios using natural language, making it more readable and understandable for non-technical stakeholders. On the other hand, Mockito is primarily used for unit testing and focuses on isolating the behavior of an object or method during testing.

  2. Test Implementation: When using Cucumber, tests are written in feature files using Gherkin syntax. These feature files contain a combination of plain English and keywords that represent test steps. In contrast, Mockito does not employ natural language test specifications. It allows developers to write test cases directly in code using Mockito API.

  3. Test Scope: Cucumber is often used to test user acceptance and integration scenarios, as it can handle end-to-end testing in a more user-friendly manner. Conversely, Mockito is mainly used for testing isolated units of code, such as individual methods or classes, without having to rely on complex external dependencies.

  4. Collaboration and Communication: Cucumber promotes collaboration between non-technical and technical stakeholders by providing a shared language for describing and understanding product behavior. It serves as a bridge between the business and development teams. Mockito, however, focuses more on technical aspects by providing a flexible and powerful mocking framework for creating realistic test environments.

  5. Integration with Other Tools: Cucumber can integrate with various tools like Selenium for browser automation, which makes it suitable for testing web applications. Mockito, on the other hand, integrates well with popular testing frameworks such as JUnit and TestNG, allowing seamless test execution and result reporting.

  6. Test Double Usages: Cucumber does not offer built-in support for test doubles like mocks and stubs. It focuses more on the interaction of end-to-end scenarios. In contrast, Mockito specializes in creating mock objects, stubs, and spies, making it ideal for mocking dependencies and testing isolated units of code.

In Summary, Cucumber is a BDD testing framework that emphasizes readable and understandable test scenarios using natural language, while Mockito is a framework for unit testing that allows isolation of code behavior using mocks and stubs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito
Mockito
Cucumber
Cucumber

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
180
Followers
927
Votes
0
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report

What are some alternatives to Mockito, Cucumber?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana