StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs PHPUnit

Cucumber vs PHPUnit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
Stacks2.8K
Followers287
Votes14
GitHub Stars20.0K
Forks2.2K
Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36

Cucumber vs PHPUnit: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cucumber and PHPUnit are both widely used testing frameworks, but they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Test Structure: Cucumber is primarily used for behavior-driven development (BDD) and follows a natural language syntax called Gherkin. Gherkin allows non-technical stakeholders to understand and contribute to the test scenarios. On the other hand, PHPUnit is a unit testing framework specifically designed for testing PHP code. It focuses on writing tests at the code level, without the natural language syntax.

  2. Language and Platform: Cucumber is primarily used with Ruby, although there are implementations available for other programming languages as well. It is a tool that can be used across different platforms. PHPUnit, on the other hand, is specifically designed for testing PHP code and is tightly integrated with the PHP language and its ecosystem.

  3. Test Types: Cucumber is designed for high-level acceptance and integration testing, often written from the perspective of end-users. It is mainly used for black-box testing, ensuring that the system behaves as expected. PHPUnit, on the other hand, focuses on unit testing, where individual units of code are tested in isolation. It allows developers to test functions, methods, and classes at a granular level.

  4. Test Execution: In Cucumber, tests are written in plain English using Gherkin syntax, making them more readable and understandable by non-technical stakeholders. These tests are then executed using an automation tool, such as Selenium, that drives the application under test. PHPUnit tests, on the other hand, are written as code using the PHP language and are executed directly by the testing framework.

  5. Test Coverage: Cucumber allows for a higher-level test coverage, ensuring that the application is working as expected from the end-user's perspective. It focuses on testing the application's behavior and functionality. PHPUnit, being a unit testing framework, allows for more detailed and granular test coverage at the code level. It helps in catching bugs and errors in individual units of code.

  6. Integration with Development Workflow: Cucumber is often used in combination with other tools like continuous integration servers (e.g., Jenkins) and version control systems (e.g., Git) to automate the execution of tests and provide feedback throughout the development process. PHPUnit is tightly integrated with PHP development workflows and can be easily integrated into build systems and continuous integration processes specific to the PHP ecosystem.

In Summary, Cucumber is a behavior-driven testing framework primarily used for acceptance and integration testing, while PHPUnit is a unit testing framework specifically designed for PHP code. Cucumber focuses on high-level tests written in natural language, whereas PHPUnit is used for unit testing at the code level.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
Cucumber
Cucumber

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.8K
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
287
Followers
927
Votes
14
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    TDD Unit Testing
  • 2
    Software Quality
  • 2
    TDD Acceptance Testing
  • 2
    TDD Integration Testing
  • 1
    TDD Unit Testing
Cons
  • 1
    Mocked services require more effort and understanding
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report

What are some alternatives to PHPUnit, Cucumber?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

react-testing-library

react-testing-library

It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana