StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Transfer
  5. FileZilla vs cURL

FileZilla vs cURL

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FileZilla
FileZilla
Stacks182
Followers93
Votes0
cURL
cURL
Stacks525
Followers254
Votes1
GitHub Stars39.8K
Forks6.9K

FileZilla vs cURL: What are the differences?

  1. User Interface: FileZilla provides a graphical user interface (GUI) with an intuitive drag-and-drop functionality, making it user-friendly for beginners. On the other hand, cURL operates through the command line interface (CLI), requiring users to input commands, which might be more suitable for advanced users familiar with the terminal.
  2. Protocols Supported: FileZilla supports FTP, FTPS, and SFTP protocols, offering a range of options for secure file transfer. In contrast, cURL supports a wide array of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, LDAP, and more, making it versatile for various networking tasks beyond just file transfer.
  3. Automation: FileZilla lacks the ability to be fully automated for batch file transfers or scripting tasks, as it relies heavily on manual user interaction. Conversely, cURL is designed for automation, allowing users to easily execute multiple file transfer operations sequentially within scripts or batch files.
  4. Cross-Platform Compatibility: FileZilla is available on Windows, macOS, and Linux systems, catering to a wide range of users across different platforms. Conversely, cURL is a command-line tool that is compatible with a broader range of operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Unix systems.
  5. Customization: FileZilla offers limited customization options in terms of user interface and functionalities, as it is primarily a file transfer client. On the other hand, cURL provides extensive customization options through various command-line parameters, enabling users to fine-tune their networking tasks according to their specific requirements.

In Summary, FileZilla and cURL differ in terms of user interface, supported protocols, automation capabilities, cross-platform compatibility, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FileZilla
FileZilla
cURL
cURL

It is a powerful and free software for transferring files over the Internet. It is a very popular FTP client and is used by webmasters from all over the world.

Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.

Easy to use; Supports FTP; Cross-platform
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
39.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.9K
Stacks
182
Stacks
525
Followers
93
Followers
254
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Quickly view HTTP headers
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to FileZilla, cURL?

WeTransfer

WeTransfer

It is file sharing at its simplest. It works as if your e-mail account can support those large file sizes, you type in your e-mail address and the recipient’s e-mail address, add a message, attach the file, and send.

Flurl

Flurl

It is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library for .NET.

WinSCP

WinSCP

It is a popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows. Copy file between a local computer and remote servers using FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, WebDAV or S3 file transfer protocols.

HTTPie

HTTPie

It is a Modern command line HTTP client – user-friendly curl alternative with intuitive UI, JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, etc

Cyberduck

Cyberduck

It is a libre server and cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows with support for FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox.

AWS Transfer for SFTP

AWS Transfer for SFTP

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol. AWS helps you seamlessly migrate your file transfer workflows to AWS Transfer for SFTP—by integrating with existing authentication systems, and providing DNS routing with Amazon Route 53—so nothing changes for your customers and partners, or their applications.

telegram-download-deamon

telegram-download-deamon

A simple script to automate telegram download of big files. If you have got an Internet connected computer or NAS and you want to automate file downloading from Telegram channels, this daemon is for you.

MEDoc

MEDoc

It is the best assistant in working with all types of documents in electronic form: tax invoices, acts, invoices and reports.

Couchdrop

Couchdrop

Couchdrop is a cloud-native b2b file exchange platform that simplifies secure file transfers across organizational boundaries with zero infrastructure management.

MoveBot

MoveBot

Movebot is a platform-agnostic data migration tool that simplifies mailbox and file migrations from cloud to cloud, on-prem to cloud, and between cloud tenants with powerful scanning, reporting, and data transformation features.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase