StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. DigitalOcean Block Storage vs Rook

DigitalOcean Block Storage vs Rook

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DigitalOcean Block Storage
DigitalOcean Block Storage
Stacks11
Followers20
Votes2
Rook
Rook
Stacks54
Followers103
Votes4
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks2.8K

DigitalOcean Block Storage vs Rook: What are the differences?

DigitalOcean Block Storage vs. Rook

1. **Installation and Management**: DigitalOcean Block Storage provides a managed service where users can easily attach additional storage to their droplets, whereas Rook requires manual installation and management as it is a cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes.
2. **Elasticity and Scalability**: DigitalOcean Block Storage allows for elastic storage that can be easily scaled up or down based on user needs, while Rook offers scalability by allowing users to flexibly scale storage capacity and performance within their Kubernetes cluster.
3. **Data Protection**: DigitalOcean Block Storage offers data redundancy through snapshots and backups, ensuring data protection and security, while Rook provides data protection through replication and recovery mechanisms within the Kubernetes environment.
4. **Compatibility**: DigitalOcean Block Storage is compatible with any cloud environment or infrastructure system, providing seamless integration, while Rook is specifically designed for Kubernetes environments, offering compatibility and optimization for containerized applications.
5. **Cost Efficiency**: DigitalOcean Block Storage offers transparent pricing and predictable costs based on usage, making it cost-effective for users, while Rook, being open-source, provides cost efficiency through its community-driven development and support model.
6. **Performance**: DigitalOcean Block Storage offers high-performance SSD storage options for optimized I/O operations, catering to demanding workloads, while Rook optimizes storage performance for containerized applications by leveraging Kubernetes features and capabilities.

In Summary, DigitalOcean Block Storage and Rook differ in terms of installation, management, scalability, data protection, compatibility, cost efficiency, and performance, catering to different user requirements and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DigitalOcean Block Storage
DigitalOcean Block Storage
Rook
Rook

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

-
Simple and reliable automated resource management; Hyper-scale or hyper-converge your storage clusters; Efficiently distribute and replicate data to minimize loss; Provision, file, block, and object with multiple storage providers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
11
Stacks
54
Followers
20
Followers
103
Votes
2
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Cheap
Pros
  • 3
    Minio Integration
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 2
    Ceph is difficult
  • 1
    Slow
Integrations
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean Load Balancer
DigitalOcean Load Balancer
DigitalOcean Monitoring
DigitalOcean Monitoring
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Cassandra
Cassandra
CockroachDB
CockroachDB

What are some alternatives to DigitalOcean Block Storage, Rook?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase