StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. EJS vs doT.js

EJS vs doT.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

doT.js
doT.js
Stacks6
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.0K
EJS
EJS
Stacks522
Followers359
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks859

EJS vs doT.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this markdown, we will compare EJS and doT.js, two popular templating engines used with JavaScript.

  1. Syntax: EJS uses delimiters <% %> for embedding JavaScript code, while doT.js uses {{ }}. This difference in syntax affects how code is integrated within the templates.
  2. Security: EJS has built-in features to help prevent Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attacks, like automatic HTML escaping. In contrast, doT.js may require additional precautions against XSS vulnerabilities.
  3. Performance: EJS tends to be faster in rendering templates compared to doT.js due to its simpler parsing mechanism, making it more suitable for high-traffic websites.
  4. Flexibility: EJS allows for more control over template rendering and offers features like layouts, includes, and filters. On the other hand, doT.js is simpler and more lightweight, focusing on speed and minimalism.
  5. Community Support: EJS has a larger community and more plugins available, making it easier to find solutions and resources online. doT.js, while still popular, may have less extensive community support and documentation.
  6. Popularity: EJS is widely used in projects and has established itself as a reliable choice for templating in JavaScript applications, while doT.js, while powerful, may not have the same level of adoption in the development community.

In Summary, EJS and doT.js differ in syntax, security features, performance, flexibility, community support, and popularity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

doT.js
doT.js
EJS
EJS

It is a fastest and concise javascript template engine for Node.js and browsers. It was created in search of the fastest and concise JavaScript templating function with emphasis on performance under V8 and Node.js. It shows great performance for both Node.js and browsers.

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

No dependencies, 120 loc; Extremely fast; Custom delimiters; Runtime evaluation; Runtime interpolation; Compile-time evaluation
Template caching and partials;Intelligent error handling with line numbers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
1.0K
GitHub Forks
859
Stacks
6
Stacks
522
Followers
19
Followers
359
Votes
0
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 6
    For a beginner it's just plain javascript code
  • 6
    It'a easy to understand the concept behind it
  • 3
    Quick for templating UI project
  • 3
    You almost know how to use it from start
Integrations
gulp
gulp
Node.js
Node.js
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to doT.js, EJS?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase