.NET Core vs MEAN: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between .NET Core and MEAN stack.

1. **Architecture**: .NET Core is a cross-platform, open-source framework provided by Microsoft for building modern, cloud-based, internet-connected applications, while MEAN stack is a collection of JavaScript technologies used for developing web applications.
2. **Technology Stack**: .NET Core primarily uses C# as its programming language and provides a set of libraries and tools for development, whereas MEAN stack consists of MongoDB (database), Express.js (web framework), Angular (front-end framework) and Node.js (runtime environment).
3. **Community Support**: .NET Core has a strong community support from Microsoft and the developer community, with regular updates and improvements, whereas MEAN stack has a more diverse community support due to its open-source nature but might lack the same level of support as .NET Core.
4. **Scalability**: .NET Core is known for its scalability and performance optimization features, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications, while MEAN stack can also be used for scalable applications but may require additional effort in optimization.
5. **Deployment and Hosting**: .NET Core applications can be deployed on various platforms including Windows, Linux, and macOS, with support from Microsoft Azure and other cloud services, whereas MEAN stack applications are typically deployed on cloud platforms like AWS, Heroku, or Google Cloud Platform.
6. **Learning Curve**: .NET Core might have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with C# and the .NET ecosystem, whereas MEAN stack, being a collection of JavaScript technologies, is more accessible to developers with JavaScript experience. 

In Summary, .NET Core and MEAN stack differ in their architecture, technology stack, community support, scalability, deployment options, and learning curve.