StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Gin Gonic

.NET vs Gin Gonic

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.3K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic
Stacks393
Followers340
Votes16
GitHub Stars86.8K
Forks8.5K

.NET vs Gin Gonic: What are the differences?

Markdown is a lightweight markup language used for formatting text that can be converted into HTML. It is widely used in websites and documentation. In this task, we will format the information about the key differences between .NET and Gin Gonic as Markdown code that can be used on a website.
  1. Dependency Management: In .NET, dependency management is handled by NuGet, a package manager that allows developers to easily add, remove, and update packages in their projects. Gin Gonic, on the other hand, uses Go modules for dependency management. Go modules provide versioning and dependency resolution, making it easier to manage external packages and their versions.

  2. Language Support: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft and primarily supports C# as the main programming language. It also supports other languages such as F# and Visual Basic.NET. Gin Gonic, on the other hand, is a Go web framework that specifically supports the Go programming language. It leverages the simplicity and efficiency of Go to build web applications.

  3. Performance: .NET is known for its performance due to the Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation, where the code is compiled to machine-level instructions at runtime. This results in faster execution speed for .NET applications. Gin Gonic, being built with the Go language, also provides excellent performance. Go is known for its efficient memory management and concurrency support, making Gin Gonic well-suited for building high-performance web applications.

  4. Ecosystem and Community: .NET has a large ecosystem and community support due to its long history and association with Microsoft. There are numerous libraries, frameworks, and tools available for .NET, which makes it easy to find solutions and resources. Gin Gonic, though relatively newer compared to .NET, also has a growing community of developers. While its ecosystem may not be as extensive as .NET's, it still provides a sufficient range of packages and resources for building web applications.

  5. Concurrency Model: .NET provides support for multi-threading and concurrency through the Task Parallel Library (TPL) and async/await keywords. Developers can easily write asynchronous code to handle concurrent operations. Gin Gonic, built with Go, embraces a concurrency model called goroutines. Goroutines are lightweight threads that allow developers to write concurrent code with ease. Go's concurrency model simplifies the development of highly scalable and concurrent web applications.

  6. Application Deployment: In .NET, applications can be deployed on various platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. The .NET Core runtime allows for cross-platform deployments. Gin Gonic, being built with Go, also supports cross-platform deployment. Go compiles to standalone binaries, making it easy to distribute and run applications on different platforms without requiring the Go runtime to be installed.

In summary, the key differences between .NET and Gin Gonic lie in their dependency management approaches, language support, performance characteristics, ecosystem and community, concurrency models, and application deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, Gin Gonic

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
86.8K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
8.5K
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
393
Followers
5.9K
Followers
340
Votes
1.9K
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 11
    Hight performance
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Low performance
  • 1
    No wildcard routing
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to .NET, Gin Gonic?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase