StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Dropzone.js vs jQuery UI

Dropzone.js vs jQuery UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Stacks40.6K
Followers13.3K
Votes899
GitHub Stars11.3K
Forks5.3K
Dropzone.js
Dropzone.js
Stacks68
Followers20
Votes0

Dropzone.js vs jQuery UI: What are the differences?

<Dropzone.js and jQuery UI are both popular JavaScript libraries used for file uploads and handling user interactions on websites.>

  1. Design and User Experience: Dropzone.js is focused specifically on file uploads and provides a clean, customizable interface for users to drag and drop files into. On the other hand, jQuery UI is a more general-purpose library with a wider range of widgets and components, which also includes file upload functionality, but not as specialized as Dropzone.js.

  2. Dependencies and Size: Dropzone.js is a standalone library with no external dependencies, making it lightweight and easy to integrate into projects. In contrast, jQuery UI requires jQuery as a dependency, increasing its overall file size and potentially causing conflicts with other plugins or libraries that also rely on jQuery.

  3. Customization and Theming: Dropzone.js offers extensive customization options for developers to tailor the appearance and behavior of the file upload interface to match their website's design. jQuery UI, while customizable, may not offer the same level of specificity and control when it comes to theming the file upload component.

  4. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Dropzone.js is known for its straightforward API and easy-to-use documentation, making it a popular choice for developers looking to quickly implement file upload functionality. jQuery UI, with its wider range of components and features, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners or those not familiar with the library's intricacies.

  5. Community and Support: Dropzone.js has a dedicated community of users and developers who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums and documentation. While jQuery UI also has a strong community, its focus on a broader set of features may mean that file upload-related issues or updates could receive less attention compared to Dropzone.js.

  6. Browser Compatibility and Performance: Dropzone.js is optimized for modern browsers and performance, ensuring a smooth file upload experience for users. jQuery UI, being a more general-purpose library, may not offer the same level of performance optimization specifically tailored for file uploads, leading to potential performance issues on older browsers or less powerful devices.

In Summary, Dropzone.js and jQuery UI differ in their focus on file uploads, dependencies, customization, ease of use, community support, and performance optimizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Dropzone.js
Dropzone.js

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

A light weight JavaScript library that turns an HTML element. This means that a user can drag and drop a file onto it, and the file gets uploaded to the server via AJAX.

-
File uploads;Drag and drop;Image previews
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
40.6K
Stacks
68
Followers
13.3K
Followers
20
Votes
899
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 215
    Ui components
  • 156
    Cross-browser
  • 121
    Easy
  • 100
    It's jquery
  • 81
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Does not contain charts or graphs
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
WordPress
WordPress
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to jQuery UI, Dropzone.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase