StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Dropzone.js vs Kendo UI

Dropzone.js vs Kendo UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K
Dropzone.js
Dropzone.js
Stacks68
Followers20
Votes0

Dropzone.js vs Kendo UI: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

  1. File Upload Functionality: Dropzone.js primarily focuses on providing a straightforward drag-and-drop file upload functionality, making it a popular choice for developers seeking a streamlined upload process. On the other hand, Kendo UI offers a more comprehensive set of UI components and functionalities beyond just file uploading, catering to a wider range of web development needs.

  2. Integration with Other Libraries: Dropzone.js is designed to be lightweight and easily integratable with various frontend libraries and frameworks like jQuery, making it a convenient choice for developers already using these tools. In contrast, Kendo UI is a comprehensive framework in itself, offering a full suite of UI components that may be more beneficial for developers looking for a one-stop solution.

  3. Customization Options: Dropzone.js provides a high level of customization for the file upload interface, allowing developers to tailor the look and feel of the upload process to suit their specific project requirements. On the other hand, Kendo UI offers a wide range of pre-built themes and styling options, making it easier for developers to achieve a consistent design across multiple components in their application.

  4. Community Support and Documentation: Dropzone.js has a dedicated community of users who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums and documentation, making it easier for developers to troubleshoot issues and find resources to enhance their implementation. In comparison, Kendo UI is backed by Telerik, a well-established company that offers professional support services and extensive documentation for their framework.

  5. License and Cost: Dropzone.js is an open-source project released under the MIT License, allowing developers to use it freely in their commercial projects without any cost implications. Conversely, Kendo UI is a commercial product with different licensing options based on project needs, which may be a determining factor for developers working on commercial applications with specific budget constraints.

  6. Browser Compatibility: Dropzone.js is known for its robust browser compatibility, ensuring a seamless upload experience across different browsers and platforms. Kendo UI also boasts strong browser support but may require additional configuration or adjustments to achieve the same level of consistency in older or less common browsers.

In Summary, Dropzone.js and Kendo UI differ in their primary focus on file upload functionality, integration with other libraries, customization options, community support and documentation, license and cost structure, and browser compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Dropzone.js
Dropzone.js

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

A light weight JavaScript library that turns an HTML element. This means that a user can drag and drop a file onto it, and the file gets uploaded to the server via AJAX.

Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
File uploads;Drag and drop;Image previews
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
297
Stacks
68
Followers
359
Followers
20
Votes
33
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    AngularJS
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Awdawd
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
  • 1
    Poor customizability
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS
WordPress
WordPress
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, Dropzone.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase