StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. DuckDB vs Hadoop

DuckDB vs Hadoop

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
DuckDB
DuckDB
Stacks49
Followers60
Votes0

DuckDB vs Hadoop: What are the differences?

DuckDB vs Hadoop

DuckDB and Hadoop are both popular tools used in the world of data analytics and processing. However, they have some key differences that set them apart from each other. Below are the main differences between DuckDB and Hadoop:

  1. Data Storage and Processing: DuckDB is an in-memory analytical database that processes data in memory, allowing for faster data retrieval and analysis. On the other hand, Hadoop is a distributed file system that breaks down data into smaller chunks and distributes them across a cluster of computers for processing. This distributed processing approach allows Hadoop to handle extremely large datasets.

  2. Architecture: DuckDB follows a traditional database architecture with a SQL-based interface, making it easier to use for users with SQL querying experience. Hadoop, on the other hand, has a distributed architecture that is designed to handle massive amounts of structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data.

  3. Data Processing Paradigm: DuckDB is best suited for OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) workloads, where queries are typically analytical and require complex aggregations. Hadoop, on the other hand, is designed for distributed data processing and is optimized for handling big data workloads, including batch processing, real-time processing, and data streaming.

  4. Scalability: DuckDB is primarily intended for single-node setups and may not scale as well as Hadoop in large-scale distributed environments. Hadoop's distributed nature allows it to scale horizontally by adding more commodity hardware to the cluster, making it an ideal choice for dealing with massive datasets.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Hadoop has a larger and more mature community and ecosystem compared to DuckDB. This means that Hadoop has extensive documentation, libraries, and tools developed by the community, making it easier to find solutions to various data processing challenges. DuckDB, being a relatively newer project, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison.

  6. Use Cases: DuckDB is well-suited for interactive, ad-hoc analytical queries where real-time responses are crucial. It excels in scenarios where low-latency access to data is required. Hadoop, on the other hand, is often used for batch processing, long-running data jobs, and scenarios where fault tolerance and high scalability are paramount.

In summary, DuckDB and Hadoop differ in terms of their data storage and processing approaches, architecture, data processing paradigms, scalability, community and ecosystem support, and use cases. Understanding these differences will help you choose the right tool for your specific data processing requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
DuckDB
DuckDB

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

It is an embedded database designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast while embedded in another process. It is designed to be easy to install and easy to use. DuckDB has no external dependencies. It has bindings for C/C++, Python and R.

-
Embedded database; Designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast; No external dependencies
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
49
Followers
2.3K
Followers
60
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
C++
C++
R Language
R Language

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, DuckDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase