StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Fastify

Echo vs Fastify

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K
Fastify
Fastify
Stacks503
Followers523
Votes95
GitHub Stars34.9K
Forks2.5K

Echo vs Fastify: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Echo and Fastify.

1. **Performance**: Fastify is known for its high performance due to its low overhead and efficient architecture, which makes it faster in handling requests compared to Echo.
2. **Middleware Support**: Echo provides a vast array of middleware options out of the box, while Fastify encourages users to rely more on plugins for middleware functionalities.
3. **Validation**: Fastify has built-in request validation support, making it easier for developers to validate and sanitize incoming data as compared to Echo where developers need to manage validation manually using libraries.
4. **Error Handling**: Echo offers more control over error handling through customizable error handling middleware, whereas Fastify has a more streamlined approach with built-in error handling mechanisms.
5. **TypeScript Support**: Fastify has strong support for TypeScript out of the box, making it easier for developers to write type-safe code, in contrast to Echo which requires additional setup and configuration for TypeScript support.
6. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Fastify has a larger and more mature ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality, while Echo's plugin ecosystem is still growing and may have limited options for certain use cases.

In Summary, Fastify excels in performance and validation support, with a strong emphasis on TypeScript, while Echo provides more middleware options and customizable error handling capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Echo
Echo
Fastify
Fastify

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
100% asynchronous: all the core is implemented with asynchronous code, in this way not even a millisecond is wasted.;Highly performant: as far as we know, Fastify is one of the fastest web frameworks in town, depending on the code complexity we can serve up to 20000 request per second.;Extendible: Fastify is fully extensible via its hooks, plugins and decorators.;Schema based: even if it is not mandatory we recommend to use JSON Schema to validate your routes and serialize your outputs, internally Fastify compiles the schema in an highly performant function.;Logging: logs are extremely important but are costly; we chose the best logger to almost remove this cost, Pino!;Developer friendly: the framework is built to be very expressive and help the developer in his daily use, without sacrificing performance and security.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Stars
34.9K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
346
Stacks
503
Followers
187
Followers
523
Votes
59
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 10
    Performance
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Lightweight
Pros
  • 21
    Performance
  • 13
    Easy to use
  • 12
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Middleware
Cons
  • 1
    Small community
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Echo, Fastify?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase