StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Koa

Echo vs Koa

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Koa
Koa
Stacks812
Followers483
Votes12
GitHub Stars35.7K
Forks3.2K
Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K

Echo vs Koa: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Echo and Koa are two popular web frameworks used in the development of web applications in Go and Node.js, respectively. While both frameworks offer similar functionalities, there are key differences between them that developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

  1. Middleware Handling: One of the major differences between Echo and Koa is in how they handle middleware. Echo uses a single middleware handler function, whereas Koa allows for the use of multiple middleware functions, providing more flexibility and control during the request-response cycle.

  2. Error Handling: Another key difference lies in the approach to error handling. Echo has built-in error handling mechanisms that simplify the process for developers, while Koa requires manual configuration for error handling, giving developers more control but also requiring additional effort to set up.

  3. Performance: When it comes to performance, Echo is known for its speed and efficiency, making it a popular choice for high-performance applications. Koa, on the other hand, may not be as fast as Echo but offers a more lightweight and minimalist approach, making it suitable for smaller projects or situations where performance is not the top priority.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Echo benefits from a larger community and ecosystem compared to Koa, which can be advantageous for developers looking for support, resources, and third-party integrations. Koa, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community but offers more modern features and practices.

  5. Ease of Use: Echo is often praised for its simplicity and ease of use, with a straightforward API that is easy to understand and work with, making it a great choice for beginners or developers looking for a quick setup. Koa, while more flexible and powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its more intricate design and structure.

In Summary, Echo and Koa differ in their middleware handling, error handling, performance, community support, and ease of use, providing developers with a choice based on their specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Koa
Koa
Echo
Echo

Koa aims to be a smaller, more expressive, and more robust foundation for web applications and APIs. Through leveraging generators Koa allows you to ditch callbacks and greatly increase error-handling. Koa does not bundle any middleware.

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

Provides 3 different kinds of functions as middleware; common function; async function; generator function
Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
35.7K
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
812
Stacks
346
Followers
483
Followers
187
Votes
12
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Async/Await
  • 5
    JavaScript
  • 1
    REST API
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Performance
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Lightweight
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Koa, Echo?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase