Eel vs JUCE

Overview

JUCE

Stacks39

Followers74

Votes10

Eel

Stacks6

Followers83

Votes0

Eel vs JUCE: What are the differences?

Introduction

Eel and JUCE are both frameworks used for developing desktop applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

Ease of Use: Eel is a Python library that allows developers to create simple HTML/CSS/JavaScript interfaces for Python applications, making it easy for Python developers to build desktop applications with web technologies. On the other hand, JUCE is a C++ framework that requires knowledge of C++ programming language, making it more suitable for experienced C++ developers.
Cross-platform Compatibility: Eel is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing developers to build applications that can run on different platforms. JUCE, on the other hand, is a cross-platform framework that not only supports desktop platforms but also offers support for mobile platforms like iOS and Android, making it a more versatile option.
User Interface Design: Eel relies on web technologies for user interface design, meaning developers can leverage tools and libraries available in the web development ecosystem to create visually appealing and interactive interfaces. JUCE, on the other hand, provides its own set of tools and libraries specifically designed for creating desktop and mobile user interfaces, giving developers more control over the appearance and functionality of their applications.
Performance: Eel applications are built on top of Python, which is an interpreted language, making them generally slower in terms of performance compared to applications built with JUCE, which is based on C++. However, Eel provides the option to optimize performance by using native C/C++ extensions, allowing developers to improve the performance of their applications.
Community and Support: Eel has a smaller community compared to JUCE, which is a more established framework with a larger user base. This means that developers using JUCE can benefit from a wider range of resources, tutorials, and community support, making it easier to find help and solutions to problems.
Licensing: Eel is an open-source library released under the MIT license, allowing developers to use it freely and modify the source code according to their needs. JUCE, on the other hand, offers both open-source and commercial licenses, giving developers the flexibility to choose the licensing model that suits their requirements.

In summary, Eel is a Python library that provides an easy way to create desktop applications using web technologies, while JUCE is a versatile C++ framework that supports not only desktop platforms but also mobile platforms. Eel offers simplicity and cross-platform compatibility, while JUCE provides more control over user interface design, better performance, a larger community, and licensing options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

JUCE	Eel
It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.	Python3 library for making simple Electron-like offline HTML/JS GUI apps, with full access to Python capabilities and libraries. It hosts a local webserver, then lets you annotate functions in Python so that they can be called from Javascript, and vice versa.
For desktop and mobile; Building powerful and complex applications; User Interface & Graphics; Audio & plug-ins.	-
Statistics
Stacks 39	Stacks 6
Followers 74	Followers 83
Votes 10	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Cross platform 2 Fast 1 Pure C++ code 1 Performance 1 Open Source Cons 2 Free Edition has Made with Juce	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Android OS React Native C++ Windows macOS iOS	Python

What are some alternatives to JUCE, Eel?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Related Comparisons

Eel vs JUCE: What are the differences?

Introduction

Eel and JUCE are both frameworks used for developing desktop applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

Ease of Use: Eel is a Python library that allows developers to create simple HTML/CSS/JavaScript interfaces for Python applications, making it easy for Python developers to build desktop applications with web technologies. On the other hand, JUCE is a C++ framework that requires knowledge of C++ programming language, making it more suitable for experienced C++ developers.
Cross-platform Compatibility: Eel is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing developers to build applications that can run on different platforms. JUCE, on the other hand, is a cross-platform framework that not only supports desktop platforms but also offers support for mobile platforms like iOS and Android, making it a more versatile option.
User Interface Design: Eel relies on web technologies for user interface design, meaning developers can leverage tools and libraries available in the web development ecosystem to create visually appealing and interactive interfaces. JUCE, on the other hand, provides its own set of tools and libraries specifically designed for creating desktop and mobile user interfaces, giving developers more control over the appearance and functionality of their applications.
Performance: Eel applications are built on top of Python, which is an interpreted language, making them generally slower in terms of performance compared to applications built with JUCE, which is based on C++. However, Eel provides the option to optimize performance by using native C/C++ extensions, allowing developers to improve the performance of their applications.
Community and Support: Eel has a smaller community compared to JUCE, which is a more established framework with a larger user base. This means that developers using JUCE can benefit from a wider range of resources, tutorials, and community support, making it easier to find help and solutions to problems.
Licensing: Eel is an open-source library released under the MIT license, allowing developers to use it freely and modify the source code according to their needs. JUCE, on the other hand, offers both open-source and commercial licenses, giving developers the flexibility to choose the licensing model that suits their requirements.

Eel vs JUCE

Overview