StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Eel vs Qt5

Eel vs Qt5

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Eel
Eel
Stacks6
Followers83
Votes0
Qt5
Qt5
Stacks91
Followers136
Votes12

Eel vs Qt5: What are the differences?

  1. Execution Context: Eel uses a modern web browser like Chromium to render the GUI, allowing for more flexibility in design and access to web technologies, while Qt5 uses its native C++ rendering engine, providing better performance but limited web integration.
  2. Integration with Python: Eel seamlessly integrates with Python, enabling easy communication between front-end (HTML/CSS/JS) and back-end (Python) components, whereas Qt5 has its own Python bindings (PyQt/PySide) for this purpose.
  3. Development Workflow: Eel simplifies the development process by using web technologies that are familiar to web developers, reducing the learning curve, while Qt5 requires knowledge of C++ or PyQt/PySide for development, which may be challenging for those unfamiliar with these tools.
  4. Platform Support: Eel's web-based approach allows for cross-platform compatibility out of the box, supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux effortlessly, whereas Qt5, although also cross-platform, requires additional configurations and dependencies on certain platforms.
  5. Community Support: Qt5 has a large, established community with extensive documentation, resources, and support forums, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and find solutions compared to the relatively smaller community surrounding Eel.
  6. UI Design Customization: Eel provides more flexibility in UI design through web technologies like CSS and JavaScript, allowing for modern, responsive interfaces, while Qt5 offers more extensive built-in UI components and styling options within its framework, suitable for traditional desktop applications.

In Summary, Eel and Qt5 differ in their execution context, integration with Python, development workflow, platform support, community support, and UI design customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Eel
Eel
Qt5
Qt5

Python3 library for making simple Electron-like offline HTML/JS GUI apps, with full access to Python capabilities and libraries. It hosts a local webserver, then lets you annotate functions in Python so that they can be called from Javascript, and vice versa.

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

-
full development framework ; Internationalization support; embedded toolchains
Statistics
Stacks
6
Stacks
91
Followers
83
Followers
136
Votes
0
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    Cross platform
  • 2
    C++
Integrations
Python
Python
Python
Python
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Eel, Qt5?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase