StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Electron vs Qt5

Electron vs Qt5

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148
Qt5
Qt5
Stacks91
Followers136
Votes12

Electron vs Qt5: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Electron and Qt5, two popular frameworks for developing cross-platform desktop applications.

  1. Language: One of the key differences between Electron and Qt5 is the programming language they use. Electron is based on web technologies and uses HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to develop desktop applications. On the other hand, Qt5 is based on C++ and supports other programming languages like Python, Java, and others.

  2. Rendering Engine: Electron uses Chromium, the open-source web browser project that powers Google Chrome, as its rendering engine. This allows Electron applications to have highly customizable user interfaces and take full advantage of modern web technologies. Qt5, on the other hand, uses its own native rendering engine called Qt WebEngine, which provides excellent support for HTML5, CSS, and other web standards.

  3. Platform Support: Electron is primarily designed for building desktop applications that run on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a consistent development experience across different platforms and allows developers to build cross-platform applications easily. Qt5, on the other hand, goes beyond desktop and also supports the development of applications for embedded systems, mobile devices, and other platforms.

  4. Widget vs. Web: Another significant difference between Electron and Qt5 is the approach they take to building user interfaces. Qt5 is a widget-based framework, which means that developers create user interfaces by selecting and arranging pre-built widgets. This approach allows for deep customization and fine-grained control over the user interface. Electron, on the other hand, uses web technologies to build user interfaces, which provides flexibility and enables developers to leverage their web development skills.

  5. Native vs. Cross-platform Look and Feel: Electron applications have a more consistent look and feel across different platforms due to its use of web technologies. This allows developers to create visually appealing and modern user interfaces. Qt5 applications, on the other hand, can have a more native look and feel as they use the native platform's widgets and styles. This can be desirable in certain cases where platform consistency is crucial.

  6. Integration with Native APIs: Qt5 provides extensive support for integrating with the native APIs and functionality of the target platform. This allows developers to access platform-specific features easily and create applications that seamlessly integrate with the native environment. Electron, on the other hand, often requires additional work and packages to access and utilize platform-specific functionality.

In Summary, Electron and Qt5 differ in terms of the programming language used, rendering engine, platform support, approach to building user interfaces, look and feel, and integration with native APIs. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the most suitable framework for their specific needs and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Electron
Electron
Qt5
Qt5

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
full development framework ; Internationalization support; embedded toolchains
Statistics
Stacks
11.6K
Stacks
91
Followers
10.0K
Followers
136
Votes
148
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection
Pros
  • 2
    Fast enough
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    Cross platform
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Electron, Qt5?

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Element

Element

Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase