StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Emblem.js vs Jinja

Emblem.js vs Jinja

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jinja
Jinja
Stacks2.3K
Followers292
Votes8
GitHub Stars11.2K
Forks1.7K
Emblem.js
Emblem.js
Stacks1
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.0K
Forks81

Jinja vs Emblem.js: What are the differences?

Developers describe Jinja as "Full featured template engine for Python". It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed. On the other hand, Emblem.js is detailed as "An indentation-based templating language". It is compiled to Handlebars.js that can then be compiled straight to JavaScript, that is finally rendered as HTML.

Jinja and Emblem.js can be primarily classified as "Templating Languages & Extensions" tools.

Some of the features offered by Jinja are:

  • Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention
  • Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates
  • High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode

On the other hand, Emblem.js provides the following key features:

  • Ember-friendly
  • Indented syntax
  • Alternative for Handlebars.js

Jinja and Emblem.js are both open source tools. Jinja with 6.8K GitHub stars and 1.27K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Emblem.js with 1.07K GitHub stars and 85 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jinja
Jinja
Emblem.js
Emblem.js

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

It is compiled to Handlebars.js that can then be compiled straight to JavaScript, that is finally rendered as HTML.

Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Ember-friendly; Indented syntax; Alternative for Handlebars.js
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.2K
GitHub Stars
1.0K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
81
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
1
Followers
292
Followers
1
Votes
8
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    It is simple to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ember.js
Ember.js
Git
Git
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Ember.js
Ember.js
Node.js
Node.js
JavaScript
JavaScript
JSON
JSON

What are some alternatives to Jinja, Emblem.js?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase