StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Orm
  5. Entity Framework Core vs GORM

Entity Framework Core vs GORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GORM
GORM
Stacks193
Followers128
Votes0
GitHub Stars657
Forks194
Entity Framework Core
Entity Framework Core
Stacks1.1K
Followers225
Votes16
GitHub Stars9.0K
Forks2.3K

Entity Framework Core vs GORM: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Entity Framework Core and GORM, focusing on six specific aspects.

  1. Performance: Entity Framework Core boasts better performance capabilities compared to GORM. This is mainly due to EF Core's ability to compile queries ahead of time, resulting in faster execution times. On the other hand, GORM relies on runtime reflection, which can impact performance.

  2. Language Support: EF Core supports multiple programming languages, including C#, F#, and VB.NET, making it a suitable choice for developers working with the .NET ecosystem. In contrast, GORM primarily caters to developers using the Go programming language.

  3. Database Support: EF Core provides a wide range of database provider options, including SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. This versatility makes it easier for developers to work with different database systems. GORM, on the other hand, focuses primarily on supporting popular databases such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server.

  4. Migration Workflow: EF Core offers a built-in migration framework, making it easier for developers to manage database schema changes and versioning. GORM, on the other hand, requires developers to manually handle database migrations using SQL scripts or other third-party solutions.

  5. Querying Capabilities: EF Core provides a more extensive set of querying capabilities, including LINQ (Language Integrated Query) support. This allows developers to write expressive and type-safe queries directly in their preferred programming language. While GORM also supports querying, it may not provide the same level of flexibility as EF Core.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: EF Core benefits from a large and active community of developers, offering a wealth of resources, tutorials, and community support. Additionally, it integrates well with other Microsoft technologies and frameworks, such as ASP.NET Core. GORM, while gaining popularity, may have a smaller community and a more limited ecosystem compared to EF Core.

In summary, Entity Framework Core and GORM differ in terms of performance, language support, database support, migration workflow, querying capabilities, and community/ecosystem size. These distinctions make them suitable for different development scenarios and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GORM
GORM
Entity Framework Core
Entity Framework Core

It is a fantastic ORM library for Golang, aims to be developer friendly. It is an ORM library for dealing with relational databases. This library is developed on top of database/sql package.

It is a lightweight, extensible, open source and cross-platform version of the popular Entity Framework data access technology. It can serve as an object-relational mapper (O/RM), enabling .NET developers to work with a database using .NET objects, and eliminating the need for most of the data-access code they usually need to write.

Full-Featured ORM; Associations (has one, has many, belongs to, many to many, polymorphism, single-table inheritance); Hooks (before/after create/save/update/delete/find); Eager loading with Preload, Joins; Transactions, Nested Transactions, Save Point, RollbackTo to Saved Point; Context, Prepared Statment Mode, DryRun Mode; Batch Insert, FindInBatches, Find/Create with Map, CRUD with SQL Expr and Context Valuer; SQL Builder, Upsert, Locking, Optimizer/Index/Comment Hints, Named Argument, SubQuery; Composite Primary Key, Indexes, Constraints; Auto Migrations; Logger; Extendable, flexible plugin API
Lightweight ;Extensible , Cross Platform; ORM; .NET Core; .NET Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
657
GitHub Stars
9.0K
GitHub Forks
194
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
193
Stacks
1.1K
Followers
128
Followers
225
Votes
0
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Fits very well with Microsoft technologies
  • 4
    Fast
  • 2
    Linq
  • 1
    OpenSource
  • 1
    Easy to use
Cons
  • 1
    Dbcontext
Integrations
MongoDB
MongoDB
Jenkins
Jenkins
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Groovy
Groovy
Firebird
Firebird
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Oracle
Oracle
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
MariaDB
MariaDB
Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access
SQLite
SQLite
MySQL
MySQL
.NET
.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to GORM, Entity Framework Core?

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Prisma

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

Hibernate

Hibernate

Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

MikroORM

MikroORM

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

Entity Framework

Entity Framework

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

peewee

peewee

A small, expressive orm, written in python (2.6+, 3.2+), with built-in support for sqlite, mysql and postgresql and special extensions like hstore.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

Dapper

Dapper

It is an object-relational mapping product for the Microsoft.NET platform: it provides a framework for mapping an object-oriented domain model to a traditional relational database.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase