StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Erlang vs JSON

Erlang vs JSON

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Erlang
Erlang
Stacks1.4K
Followers749
Votes345
GitHub Stars11.9K
Forks3.0K
JSON
JSON
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.6K
Votes9

Erlang vs JSON: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Erlang and JSON.

  1. Data Representation: Erlang is a programming language known for its concurrency and fault-tolerance features, while JSON, being a data interchange format, is mainly used for structuring and representing data. Erlang is used for building large-scale, distributed systems, while JSON is utilized for transmitting data between a server and a client.

  2. Complexity: Erlang's syntax may appear complex to beginners due to its functional programming nature and concurrency model, whereas JSON is relatively simple with its key-value pair structure. Erlang requires understanding concepts like pattern matching, recursion, and processes, while JSON follows a straightforward hierarchical structure.

  3. Extensibility: Erlang allows for creating custom data structures and complex data manipulation through its functional programming paradigms and built-in libraries. On the other hand, JSON lacks the ability to define custom data types or functions, limiting its extensibility compared to Erlang.

  4. Usage Context: Erlang is primarily intended for building scalable, fault-tolerant systems, especially in telecommunications and networking applications, while JSON is commonly employed for transferring data between web servers and clients in a standardized format.

  5. Interoperability: Erlang is often used in conjunction with other languages like Python, C, or Java for specific functionalities due to its unique features, whereas JSON serves as a universal data format supported by many programming languages, making it versatile for data exchange between different systems.

  6. Human Readability: JSON is designed to be easily readable by both humans and machines, employing a lightweight syntax for expressing data structures, while Erlang's syntax, though powerful for functional programming tasks, may require a deeper understanding of its principles for effective code comprehension.

In Summary, Erlang and JSON differ in data representation, complexity, extensibility, usage context, interoperability, and human readability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Erlang, JSON

Dhinesh
Dhinesh

architect

Jun 16, 2020

Needs adviceonJSONJSONPythonPython

Hi. Currently, I have a requirement where I have to create a new JSON file based on the input CSV file, validate the generated JSON file, and upload the JSON file into the application (which runs in AWS) using API. Kindly suggest the best language that can meet the above requirement. I feel Python will be better, but I am not sure with the justification of why python. Can you provide your views on this?

350k views350k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Erlang
Erlang
JSON
JSON

Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.

JavaScript Object Notation is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
2.0K
Followers
749
Followers
1.6K
Votes
345
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Real time, distributed applications
  • 62
    Concurrency Support
  • 58
    Fault tolerance
  • 36
    Soft real-time
  • 32
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Languange is not popular demand
Pros
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    Widely supported
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
JavaScript
JavaScript
JSON Server
JSON Server
JSONlite
JSONlite

What are some alternatives to Erlang, JSON?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase