StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Erlang vs Scala

Erlang vs Scala

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Erlang
Erlang
Stacks1.4K
Followers749
Votes345
GitHub Stars11.9K
Forks3.0K
Scala
Scala
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
GitHub Stars14.4K
Forks3.1K

Erlang vs Scala: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between Erlang and Scala programming languages.

  1. Concurrency Model: One of the significant differences between Erlang and Scala is their concurrency models. Erlang is built around the concept of lightweight processes, also known as actors, which communicate with each other by message passing. This model allows for scalable and fault-tolerant systems, making Erlang well-suited for building distributed and concurrent applications. On the other hand, Scala uses a combination of shared-memory concurrency and message passing. It provides constructs like Scala Futures and Akka actors to handle concurrency and parallelism.

  2. Functional Programming: Both Erlang and Scala support functional programming, but they have different approaches. Erlang is a pure functional programming language that enforces immutability and encourages the use of pattern matching to handle computations. In contrast, Scala is a hybrid language that combines object-oriented and functional programming paradigms. It allows mutability and provides higher-order functions, lambda expressions, and other functional constructs, while still supporting object-oriented programming.

  3. Scalability and Fault-tolerance: Erlang is known for its built-in support for scalability and fault-tolerance. The actor model and supervision trees in Erlang help in building robust and fault-tolerant systems. It allows for hot code swapping, which enables updates to be made to a running system without any downtime. Scala, on the other hand, relies on external libraries like Akka to provide similar features. While Scala does offer scalability and fault-tolerance, it requires additional configuration and setup compared to Erlang's native support.

  4. Concurrency Granularity: Erlang focuses on fine-grained concurrency by using lightweight processes (actors) that can be created and destroyed quickly. These processes are isolated and have minimal overhead, making it feasible to have millions of them in a single Erlang system. Scala, on the other hand, has a coarser-grained concurrency model. While it provides lightweight threads (Futures) and actor-based concurrency with Akka, the number of concurrent entities in a Scala system is typically lower compared to Erlang.

  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: Erlang's tooling and ecosystem are specifically geared towards building distributed and fault-tolerant systems. It has tools like OTP (Open Telecom Platform) for building reliable systems, along with frameworks like Elixir, which provides a more modern syntax and additional features on top of Erlang. Scala, being a more general-purpose language, has a wider range of tooling and libraries available. It has a vibrant ecosystem with popular frameworks like Play, Akka, and Spark, making it suitable for a variety of applications.

  6. Community and Adoption: Erlang has been around since the 1980s and has been widely adopted by companies in the telecommunications, messaging, and networking domains. It has a strong community and a proven track record in production systems requiring high availability. Scala, although relatively newer, has gained popularity in the Java ecosystem due to its interoperability with existing Java codebases. It has a growing community and is widely used for web development, data processing, and scalable backend systems.

Summary

In summary, Erlang and Scala differ in their concurrency models, with Erlang relying on lightweight processes (actors) and Scala offering a combination of shared-memory concurrency and message passing. Erlang is a pure functional programming language, while Scala combines functional and object-oriented programming. Erlang has native support for scalability and fault-tolerance, whereas Scala requires external libraries. Erlang's concurrency granularity is fine-grained, allowing for millions of lightweight processes, while Scala's concurrency is typically coarser-grained. Erlang's tooling is tailored for building distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while Scala has a wider range of general-purpose tooling and libraries. Finally, Erlang has a strong community and adoption in telecom and networking domains, whereas Scala has gained popularity in the Java ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Erlang, Scala

Nicholas
Nicholas

Jan 29, 2021

Decided

I am working in the domain of big data and machine learning. I am helping companies with bringing their machine learning models to the production. In many projects there is a tendency to port Python, PySpark code to Scala and Scala Spark.

This yields to longer time to market and a lot of mistakes due to necessity to understand and re-write the code. Also many libraries/apis that data scientists/machine learning practitioners use are not available in jvm ecosystem.

Simply, refactoring (if necessary) and organising the code of the data scientists by following best practices of software development is less error prone and faster comparing to re-write in Scala.

Pipeline orchestration tools such as Luigi/Airflow is python native and fits well to this picture.

I have heard some arguments against Python such as, it is slow, or it is hard to maintain due to its dynamically typed language. However cost/benefit of time consumed porting python code to java/scala alone would be enough as a counter-argument. ML pipelines rarerly contains a lot of code (if that is not the case, such as complex domain and significant amount of code, then scala would be a better fit).

In terms of performance, I did not see any issues with Python. It is not the fastest runtime around but ML applications are rarely time-critical (majority of them is batch based).

I still prefer Scala for developing APIs and for applications where the domain contains complex logic.

198k views198k
Comments
Frank
Frank

CTO at Visionary AG

Aug 25, 2022

Decided

We're moving from Java to Kotlin with our Microservice Stack (Spring Boot) because it is excellently supported by framework and tools and the learning curve is not very steep Kotlin is way more straightforward and convenient to use while providing less boilerplate and more strictness, which finally leads to better code, which is more readable, maintainable and less error-prone. We especially like Kotlin's (functional) data structures, which are, e.g. compared to Scala, easier to understand and don't require deep knowledge in functional programming.

48.8k views48.8k
Comments
Prakhar
Prakhar

Feb 7, 2022

Needs adviceonJavaJavaJavaScriptJavaScriptKotlinKotlin

Basically, I am looking for a good language that compiles to Java and JavaScript(and can use their libraries/frameworks). These JVM languages seem good to me, but I have no interest in Android. Which programming language is the best of these? I am looking for one with high money and something functional.

Edit: Kotlin was originally on this list but I removed it since I had no interest in Android

47.9k views47.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Erlang
Erlang
Scala
Scala

Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.9K
GitHub Stars
14.4K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
3.1K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
11.9K
Followers
749
Followers
7.8K
Votes
345
Votes
1.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Real time, distributed applications
  • 62
    Concurrency Support
  • 58
    Fault tolerance
  • 36
    Soft real-time
  • 32
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Languange is not popular demand
Pros
  • 188
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 175
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
Cons
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Erlang, Scala?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase